Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2022 Aug:209:75-81.
doi: 10.1016/j.puhe.2022.06.004. Epub 2022 Jun 16.

Community preferences for the allocation of scarce healthcare resources during the COVID-19 pandemic: a review of the literature

Alison Dowling  1 , Haylee Lane  2 , Terry Haines  3
Affiliations
Review

Community preferences for the allocation of scarce healthcare resources during the COVID-19 pandemic: a review of the literature

Alison Dowling et al. Public Health. 2022 Aug.

Abstract

Objective: The purpose of this thematic review is to examine the literature on the publics' preferences of scarce medical resource allocation during COVID-19.

Study design: Literature review.

Methods: A review of Ovid MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL and Scopus was performed between December 2019 and June 2022 for eligible articles.

Results: Fifteen studies using three methodologies and spanning five continents were included. Five key themes were identified: (1) prioritise the youngest; (2) save the most lives; (3) egalitarian allocation approaches; (4) prioritise healthcare workers; and (5) bias against particular groups. The public gave high priority to allocation that saved the most lives, particularly to patients who are younger and healthcare workers. Themes present but not supported as broadly were giving priority to individuals with disabilities, high frailty or those with behaviours that may have contributed to their ill-health (e.g. smokers). Allocation involving egalitarian approaches received the least support among community members.

Conclusion: The general public prefer rationing scarce medical resources in the COVID-19 pandemic based on saving the most lives and giving priority to the youngest and frontline healthcare workers rather than giving preference to patients with disabilities, frailty or perceived behaviours that may have contributed to their own ill-health. There is also little public support for allocation based on egalitarian strategies.

Keywords: COVID-19; Ethical principles; Healthcare allocation; Pandemic; Public preferences.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

All authors declare that they have no financial, personal, or potential conflict of interest.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Search process flowchart (PRISMA flow diagram).
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. COVID Live . 2022. Coronavirus statistics - worldometer. Cases and deaths from covid-19.https://www.worldometers.info/coronavirus/ (Viewed 20 April 2022)
    1. Supady A., Curtis J., Abrams D., Lorusso R., Bein T., Boldt J., et al. Allocating scarce intensive care resources during the COVID-19 pandemic: practical challenges to theoretical frameworks. Lancet Respir Med. 2021;9(4):430–434. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Emanuel E., Persad G., Upshur R., Thome B., Parker M., Glickman A., et al. Fair allocation of scarce medical resources in the time of covid-19. N Engl J Med. 2020;382(21):2049. - PubMed
    1. Rosenbaum L. Facing covid-19 in Italy - ethics, logistics, and therapeutics on the epidemic's front line.(perspective) N Engl J Med. 2020;382(20):1873. - PubMed
    1. White D., Lo B. A framework for rationing ventilators and critical care beds during the COVID-19 pandemic. JAMA. 2020;323(18):1773. - PubMed