Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Multicenter Study
. 2022 Nov;163(5):1252-1266.e2.
doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2022.06.090. Epub 2022 Jul 16.

An Exosome-based Transcriptomic Signature for Noninvasive, Early Detection of Patients With Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma: A Multicenter Cohort Study

Affiliations
Multicenter Study

An Exosome-based Transcriptomic Signature for Noninvasive, Early Detection of Patients With Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma: A Multicenter Cohort Study

Kota Nakamura et al. Gastroenterology. 2022 Nov.

Abstract

Background & aims: Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) incidence is rising worldwide, and most patients present with an unresectable disease at initial diagnosis. Measurement of carbohydrate antigen 19-9 (CA19-9) levels lacks adequate sensitivity and specificity for early detection; hence, there is an unmet need to develop alternate molecular diagnostic biomarkers for PDAC. Emerging evidence suggests that tumor-derived exosomal cargo, particularly micro RNAs (miRNAs), offer an attractive platform for the development of cancer-specific biomarkers. Herein, genomewide profiling in blood specimens was performed to develop an exosome-based transcriptomic signature for noninvasive and early detection of PDAC.

Methods: Small RNA sequencing was undertaken in a cohort of 44 patients with an early-stage PDAC and 57 nondisease controls. Using machine-learning algorithms, a panel of cell-free (cf) and exosomal (exo) miRNAs were prioritized that discriminated patients with PDAC from control subjects. Subsequently, the performance of the biomarkers was trained and validated in independent cohorts (n = 191) using quantitative reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (qRT-PCR) assays.

Results: The sequencing analysis initially identified a panel of 30 overexpressed miRNAs in PDAC. Subsequently using qRT-PCR assays, the panel was reduced to 13 markers (5 cf- and 8 exo-miRNAs), which successfully identified patients with all stages of PDAC (area under the curve [AUC] = 0.98 training cohort; AUC = 0.93 validation cohort); but more importantly, was equally robust for the identification of early-stage PDAC (stages I and II; AUC = 0.93). Furthermore, this transcriptomic signature successfully identified CA19-9 negative cases (<37 U/mL; AUC = 0.96), when analyzed in combination with CA19-9 levels, significantly improved the overall diagnostic accuracy (AUC = 0.99 vs AUC = 0.86 for CA19-9 alone).

Conclusions: In this study, an exosome-based liquid biopsy signature for the noninvasive and robust detection of patients with PDAC was developed.

Keywords: Diagnostic Biomarker; Exosome; Liquid Biopsy; Pancreatic Cancer; miRNA Signature.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of Interest: None of the authors has any potential conflicts to disclose.

Competing interests: The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Expression level of identified cell-free and exosomal miRNA candidates for the diagnosis of patients with early-stages of PDAC obtained from genome-wide small RNA sequencing. (A) Expression level of candidate cf-miRNAs and representative heatmap in patients with early-stage of PDAC (Stage I-II) versus non-disease control samples. (B) Expression level of candidate exo-miRNAs and representative heatmap in patients with PDAC (Stage I-II) versus non-disease control samples. The miRNA expression profile was z-normalized. [miRNA: micro RNA; CPM: counts per million; FC: fold change; PDAC: pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (light blue) and Non-disease controls (dark blue)].
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
Performance evaluation of cell-free and exosomal miRNA biomarker panel in clinical cohorts by qRT-PCR. Representative heatmap of statistically significant and upregulated candidate (A) cf-miRNAs and (B) exo-miRNAs in patients with PDAC versus non-disease controls. (C) ROC curves analysis for the cf-miRNA, exo-miRNA or cf- and exocombination panel in the training cohort. (D) ROC curves analysis for the cf-miRNA, exo-miRNA and cf and exosomal combination panels in the validation cohort. [Exo: exosomal; miRNA: micro RNA; qRT-PCR: Quantitative Reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction; cf: cell-free; AUC: Area under the curve; ROC: receiver operating characteristic]
Figure 3.
Figure 3.
Prioritization and performance evaluation of cell-free and exosomal miRNA biomarker panel in clinical cohorts. (A) ROC curve analysis for the cf-miRNA, exo-miRNA or cf and exosomal combination panel in the training cohort. (B) ROC curve analysis for the cf-miRNA, exo-miRNA or cf and exosomal combination panels in the validation cohort (C) ROC curve analysis to identify early-stages (stage I and II) and late stages (stage III and IV) PDAC patients from non-disease controls in validation cohort. (D) Risk score analysis in all stages PDAC patients and non-disease controls in the validation cohort. ROC curves are shown with 95% CIs. [*p< 0.001, Exo: exosomal; miRNA: micro RNA; cf: cell-free; AUC: Area under the curve; TNM: tumor-node-metastasis; PDAC: pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma; ROC: receiver operating characteristic]
Figure 4.
Figure 4.
Performance evaluation of the miRNA signature in combination with CA19-9, and diagnostic potential evaluation by decision curve analysis and calibration curve analysis. (A) ROC analysis to compare diagnostic performances between cf and exosomal combination miRNA signature and CA19-9 in all stages of PDAC patients. (B) ROC analysis to compare diagnostic performance between cf and exosomal combination miRNA signature and CA19-9 in early-stages (Stage I and II) of PDAC patients. (C) Performance of cf and exosomal combination miRNA signature in the cohort of 81 participant (22 PDAC and 59 non-disease controls) who presented with al CA19-9 level less than 37 U/mL. (D) Decision curve analysis and (E) Calibration curve analysis to evaluate the performance of the combined miRNA biomarker panel. ROC curves are shown with 95% CIs. [miRNA: micro RNA; CA19-9: carbohydrate antigen 19-9; AUC: Area under the curve; Exo: exosomal; cf: cell-free; ROC: receiver operating characteristic; PDAC: pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma]

Comment in

References

    1. Ryan DP, Hong TS, Bardeesy N. Pancreatic adenocarcinoma. N Engl J Med 2014;371:1039–49. - PubMed
    1. Kleeff J, Korc M, Apte M, et al. Pancreatic cancer. Nat Rev Dis Primers 2016;2:16022. - PubMed
    1. Mizrahi JD, Surana R, Valle JW, et al. Pancreatic cancer. The Lancet 2020;395:2008–2020. - PubMed
    1. Sung H, Ferlay J, Siegel RL, et al. Global Cancer Statistics 2020: GLOBOCAN Estimates of Incidence and Mortality Worldwide for 36 Cancers in 185 Countries. CA Cancer J Clin 2021;71:209–249. - PubMed
    1. Rahib L, Smith BD, Aizenberg R, et al. Projecting cancer incidence and deaths to 2030: the unexpected burden of thyroid, liver, and pancreas cancers in the United States. Cancer Res 2014;74:2913–21. - PubMed

Publication types