Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Jul;25 Suppl 2(Suppl 2):e25914.
doi: 10.1002/jia2.25914.

Non-clinical considerations for supporting accelerated inclusion of pregnant women in pre-licensure clinical trials with anti-HIV agents

Rick Greupink  1 , Hedwig van Hove  1 , Felix Mhlanga  2 , Peter Theunissen  3 , Angela Colbers  4
Affiliations

Non-clinical considerations for supporting accelerated inclusion of pregnant women in pre-licensure clinical trials with anti-HIV agents

Rick Greupink et al. J Int AIDS Soc. 2022 Jul.

Abstract

Introduction: To allow the continued participation of women enrolled in pre-licensure clinical trials who become pregnant, and to potentially enrol pregnant women in clinical trials, non-clinical developmental and reproductive toxicology studies (DART) are essential. Generally during pharmaceutical development, DART studies are conducted late during clinical development, leading to the exclusion of pregnant women from enrolment and withdrawal of women becoming pregnant during pre-licensure trials.

Discussion: Completing all DART studies prior to or early during the conduct of phase 3 trials (i.e. earlier than current common practice) can accelerate and facilitate the inclusion of women who become pregnant during pre-licensure trials to remain on study drug and to potentially enrol pregnant women more rapidly. Promoting complementary strategies, such as alternative combinations of DART study designs and physiologically based pharmacokinetic modelling, could better inform drug dosing and safety in pregnancy at an earlier stage in drug development. The interpretation of the results of non-clinical DART studies is often complex. Institutional review boards/ethics committees should have access to relevant expertise for interpretation and application of results of non-clinical developmental and reproductive toxicity studies. Clear communication and thorough understanding of non-clinical findings and the overall benefit-risk profile of the product are critical to review protocols and determine if women who become pregnant during a clinical trial could continue on study drug and/or to enrol pregnant women in the trial. The informed consent document should be well written so that participants can make an informed decision to stay on study drug or participate in a trial during pregnancy. Ultimately, the decision to allow women who become pregnant during pre-licensure trials to remain on study will depend on the totality of the evidence and benefit-risk considerations.

Conclusions: We propose that industry completes non-clinical reproductive toxicity studies prior to or early during the conduct of phase 3 trials in HIV drug development, especially for priority agents, and potentially uses alternative DART study design strategies to achieve this goal.

Keywords: DART; antiretroviral pharmacology; non-clinical; pregnancy; reproduction toxicology.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. International Council for Harmonisation of Technical Requirements for Pharmaceuticals for Human Use (ICH) . ICH guideline M3(R2) on non‐clinical safety studies for the conduct of human clinical trials and marketing authorisation for pharmaceuticals. 2009. Available from: https://database.ich.org/sites/default/files/M3_R2__Guideline.pdf. Accessed 11 April, 2022.
    1. International Council for Harmonisation of Technical Requirements for Pharmaceuticals for Human Use (ICH) . Detection of reproductive and developmental toxicity for human pharmaceuticals S5(R3). 2020. Available from: https://database.ich.org/sites/default/files/S5‐R3_Step4_Guideline_2020_.... Accessed 11 April, 2022.
    1. International Council for Harmonisation of Technical Requirements for Pharmaceuticals for Human Use (ICH) . Preclinical safety evaluation of biotechnology‐derived pharmaceuticals S6(R1). 2011. Available from: https://database.ich.org/sites/default/files/S6_R1_Guideline_0.pdf. Accessed 11 April, 2022.
    1. World Health Organization . Approaches to enhance and accelerate study of new drugs for HIV and associated infections in pregnant women: meeting report. 2021. Available from: https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789240040182. Accessed 11 April, 2022.
    1. World Health Organization . Conference on ARV Drug Optimization (CADO). 2022. Available from: https://www.who.int/groups/antiretroviral‐drug‐optimization. Accessed 11 April, 2022.

Substances