Automated closed volume reduction process for apheresis stem cell grafts: From development to clinical implementation
- PMID: 35851676
- DOI: 10.1111/trf.17022
Automated closed volume reduction process for apheresis stem cell grafts: From development to clinical implementation
Abstract
Background: Collection of HPC by apheresis (HPC-A) can sometimes result in higher collection volumes, increasing the dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) volume infused into patients and the space requirements in liquid nitrogen freezers. Volume reduction prior to the addition of cryoprotectant is an efficient means to reduce the DMSO load infused into patients and to optimize freezer storage space.
Study design and methods: To implement a closed semi-automated volume reduction process, a method was developed to produce leukocyte-rich mock apheresis products using buffy coats derived from whole blood collections. The mock HPC products were then used to measure the efficiency and reliability of the semi-automated process over a range of volumes and cell concentrations. The resulting data was used to support the implementation of the process with concurrent monitoring.
Results: A closed, semi-automated volume reduction process resulted in recoveries of over 93% and 91% of white blood cells and CD34+ cells with no significant loss of product viability or potency. Mean doses of CD34+ and CFU infused per kilogram recipient body weight were 4.0 ± 1.1 × 106 /kg and 4.2 ± 1.7 × 105 /kg, resulting in no delays in median time to neutrophil and platelet engraftment, significant increase in adverse reaction or nonconformances.
Discussion: The effectiveness outcomes of the first Canadian experience in the implementation of a closed semi-automated volume reduction system in the processing of HPC-A products for autologous transplant have met the predetermined acceptance criteria, supporting its use in a stem cell manufacturing laboratory compliant with good manufacturing practice regulations.
Keywords: autologous stem cell transplant; hematopoietic stem cells; mobilized peripheral blood progenitor stem cells; stem cell manufacturing laboratory; validation; volume reduction.
© 2022 AABB.
References
REFERENCES
-
- Wu FY, Heng KK, Salleh RB, Soh TG, Lee JJ, Mah J, et al. Comparing peripheral blood stem cell collection using the COBE spectra, haemonetics MCS+, and Baxter Amicus. Transfus Apher Sci. 2012;47(3):345-50.
-
- Karafin MS, Graminske S, Erickson P, Walters MC, Scott EP, Carter S, et al. Evaluation of the spectra optia apheresis system for mononuclear cell (MNC) collection in G-CSF mobilized and nonmobilized healthy donors: results of a multicenter study. J Clin Apher. 2014;29(5):273-80.
-
- Zinno F, Landi F, Scerpa MC, Aureli V, Lanti A, Ceccarelli S, et al. Processing of hematopoietic stem cells from peripheral blood before cryopreservation: use of a closed automated system. Transfusion. 2011;51(12):2656-63.
-
- Takahashi TA, Rebulla P, Armitage S, van Beckhoven J, Eichler H, Kekomäki R, et al. Multi-laboratory evaluation of procedures for reducing the volume of cord blood: influence on cell recoveries. Cytotherapy. 2006;8(3):254-64.
-
- Rodriguez L, Azqueta C, Azzalin S, Garcia J, Querol S. Washing of cord blood grafts after thawing: high cell recovery using an automated and closed system. Vox Sang. 2004;87(3):165-72.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Miscellaneous