Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Oct;15(5):394-401.
doi: 10.1007/s12178-022-09776-1. Epub 2022 Jul 19.

Etiology of Failed Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: a Scoping Review

Affiliations

Etiology of Failed Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: a Scoping Review

Dan Cohen et al. Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med. 2022 Oct.

Abstract

Purpose of review: Recent literature was reviewed to identify and summarize the etiology of primary anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction (ACLR) failure reported.

Methods: The databases Embase, PubMed, and Medline were searched on March 10, 2022, for English-language, clinical studies that reported on the etiology of failure of primary ACLR. The studies were systematically screened in duplicate and data abstracted.

Recent findings: Forty-three studies were identified that reported mode of failure in primary ACLR. Trauma (43 studies), technical error (11 studies), and biology (9 studies) remain the most reported etiologies of ACLR failure. A combination of causes was listed in three studies. No reported cause or "other" was listed in 22 studies. Many clinical studies fail to report etiology of ACLR failure. Level of detail provided regarding mode of failure varies widely. Trauma, technical error, and biological failure remain the leading etiologies of ACLR failure reported in recent literature. Technical error is likely underreported and a contributing factor in traumatic failures.

Keywords: Anterior cruciate ligament; Biological; Failure; Reconstruction; Technical; Trauma.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors of this paper each declare no potential conflicts of interest.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
PRISMA flow diagram demonstrating the search strategy for etiologies of ACLR failure

References

    1. Sanders TL, Maradit Kremers H, Bryan AJ, Larson DR, Dahm DL, Levy BA, Stuart MJ, Krych AJ. Incidence of anterior cruciate ligament tears and reconstruction: a 21-year population-based study. Am J Sports Med. 2016;44(6):1502–1507. doi: 10.1177/0363546516629944. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Zhang Y, McCammon J, Martin RK, Prior HJ, Leiter J, MacDonald PB. Epidemiological trends of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction in a Canadian province. Clin J Sport Med. 2020;30(6):e207–ee13. - PubMed
    1. Lind M, Menhert F, Pedersen AB. The first results from the Danish ACL reconstruction registry: epidemiologic and 2 year follow-up results from 5,818 knee ligament reconstructions. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2009;17(2):117–124. doi: 10.1007/s00167-008-0654-3. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Koga H, Engebretsen L, Fu F, Muneta T. Revision anterior cruciate ligament surgery: state of the art. J ISAKOS. 2017;2:36–46. doi: 10.1136/jisakos-2016-000071. - DOI
    1. Shen X, Qin Y, Zuo J, Liu T, Xiao J. A systematic review of risk factors for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction failure. Int J Sports Med. 2021;42(8):682-93. Recent systematic review providing comprehensive review of risk factors associated with ACLR failure. Technical error/tunnel malposition was found to be a significant risk factor in ACLR failure. - PubMed

Publication types