Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Jul:8:e2200060.
doi: 10.1200/GO.22.00060.

Cancer Medicines: What Is Essential and Affordable in India?

Affiliations

Cancer Medicines: What Is Essential and Affordable in India?

Manju Sengar et al. JCO Glob Oncol. 2022 Jul.

Abstract

Purpose: The WHO essential medicines list (EML) guides selection of drugs for national formularies. Here, we evaluate which medicines are considered highest priority by Indian oncologists and the extent to which they are available in routine practice.

Methods: This is a secondary analysis of an electronic survey developed by the WHO EML Cancer Medicine Working Group. The survey was distributed globally using a hierarchical snowball method to physicians who prescribe systemic anticancer therapy. The survey captured the 10 medicines oncologists considered highest priority for population health and their availability in routine practice.

Results: The global study cohort included 948 respondents from 82 countries; 98 were from India and 67 were from other low- and middle-income countries. Compared with other low- and middle-income countries, the Indian cohort was more likely to be medical oncologist (70% v 31%, P < .001) and work exclusively in the private health system (52% v 17%, P < .001). 14/20 most commonly selected medicines were conventional cytotoxic drugs. Universal access to these medicines was reported by a minority of oncologists; risks of significant out-of-pocket expenditures for each medicine were reported by 19%-58% of oncologists. Risk of catastrophic expenditure was reported by 58%-67% of oncologists for rituximab and trastuzumab. Risks of financial toxicity were substantially higher within the private health system compared with the public system.

Conclusion: Most high-priority cancer medicines identified by Indian oncologists are generic chemotherapy agents that provide substantial improvements in survival and are already included in WHO EML. Access to these treatments remains limited by major financial burdens experienced by patients. This is particularly acute within the private health system. Strategies are urgently needed to ensure that high-quality cancer care is affordable and accessible to all patients in India.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The following represents disclosure information provided by authors of this manuscript. All relationships are considered compensated unless otherwise noted. Relationships are self-held unless noted. I = Immediate Family Member, Inst = My Institution. Relationships may not relate to the subject matter of this manuscript. For more information about ASCO's conflict of interest policy, please refer to www.asco.org/rwc or ascopubs.org/go/authors/author-center.

Open Payments is a public database containing information reported by companies about payments made to US-licensed physicians (Open Payments).

C.S. Pramesh

This author is a member of the JCO Global Oncology Editorial Board. Journal policy recused the author from having any role in the peer review of this manuscript.

Stock and Other Ownership Interests: Aurobindo

Dorothy Lombe

This author is a member of the JCO Global Oncology Editorial Board. Journal policy recused the author from having any role in the peer review of this manuscript.

Bishal Gyawali

This author is a member of the JCO Global Oncology Editorial Board. Journal policy recused the author from having any role in the peer review of this manuscript.

Consulting or Advisory Role: Vivio Health

Felipe Roitberg

Honoraria: Boehringer Ingelheim, AstraZeneca, Oncologia Brasil

Consulting or Advisory Role: MSD Oncology

Research Funding: Roche (Inst), Boehringer Ingelheim (Inst), MSD (Inst), Bayer (Inst), AstraZeneca (Inst), Takeda (Inst)

Elisabeth G.E. De Vries

Consulting or Advisory Role: Daiichi Sankyo (Inst), NSABP Foundation (Inst), Crescendo Biologics (Inst)

Research Funding: Amgen (Inst), Synthon (Inst), CytomX Therapeutics (Inst), Regeneron (Inst), G1 Therapeutics (Inst), Bayer (Inst), Roche (Inst), Genentech (Inst), Servier (Inst), Crescendo Biologics (Inst)

Uncompensated Relationships: ESMO (Inst), World Health Organization (Inst), RECIST (Inst)

Richard Sullivan

This author is a member of the JCO Global Oncology Editorial Board. Journal policy recused the author from having any role in the peer review of this manuscript.

Honoraria: Pfizer

Consulting or Advisory Role: Pfizer (Inst)

No other potential conflicts of interest were reported.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Palumbo MO, Kavan P, Miller WH Jr, et al. : Systemic cancer therapy: Achievements and challenges that lie ahead. Front Pharmacol 4:57, 2013 - PMC - PubMed
    1. Grössmann N, Wolf S, Rothschedl E, et al. : Twelve years of European cancer drug approval—A systematic investigation of the “magnitude of clinical benefit”. ESMO Open 6:100166, 2021 - PMC - PubMed
    1. Saluja R, Arciero VS, Cheng S, et al. : Examining trends in cost and clinical benefit of novel anticancer drugs over ime. J Oncol Pract 14:e280-e294, 2018 - PubMed
    1. Del Paggio JC, Berry JS, Hopman WM, et al. : Evolution of the randomized clinical trial in the era of precision oncology. JAMA Oncol 7:728-734, 2021 - PMC - PubMed
    1. Del Paggio JC, Sullivan R, Schrag D, et al. : Delivery of meaningful cancer care: A retrospective cohort study assessing cost and benefit with the ASCO and ESMO frameworks. Lancet Oncol 18:887-894, 2017 - PubMed