Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Multicenter Study
. 2022 Jul 20;6(1):38.
doi: 10.1186/s41747-022-00284-y.

A novel MRI index for paraspinal muscle fatty infiltration: reliability and relation to pain and disability in lumbar spinal stenosis: results from a multicentre study

Affiliations
Multicenter Study

A novel MRI index for paraspinal muscle fatty infiltration: reliability and relation to pain and disability in lumbar spinal stenosis: results from a multicentre study

Hasan Banitalebi et al. Eur Radiol Exp. .

Abstract

Background: Fatty infiltration of the paraspinal muscles may play a role in pain and disability in lumbar spinal stenosis. We assessed the reliability and association with clinical symptoms of a method for assessing fatty infiltration, a simplified muscle fat index (MFI).

Methods: Preoperative axial T2-weighted magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans of 243 patients aged 66.6 ± 8.5 years (mean ± standard deviation), 119 females (49%), with symptomatic lumbar spinal stenosis were assessed. Fatty infiltration was assessed using both the MFI and the Goutallier classification system (GCS). The MFI was calculated as the signal intensity of the psoas muscle divided by that of the multifidus and erector spinae. Observer reliability was assessed in 102 consecutive patients for three independent investigators by intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) and 95% limits of agreement (LoA) for continuous variables and Gwet's agreement coefficient (AC1) for categorical variables. Associations with patient-reported pain and disability were assessed using univariate and multivariate regression analyses.

Results: Interobserver reliability was good for the MFI (ICC 0.79) and fair for the GCS (AC1 0.33). Intraobserver reliability was good or excellent for the MFI (ICC range 0.86-0.91) and moderate to almost perfect for the GCS (AC1 range 0.55-0.92). Mean interobserver differences of MFI measurements ranged from -0.09 to -0.04 (LoA -0.32 to 0.18). Adjusted for potential confounders, none of the disability or pain parameters was significantly associated with MFI or GCS.

Conclusion: The proposed MFI demonstrated high observer reliability but was not associated with preoperative pain or disability.

Keywords: Magnetic resonance imaging; Paraspinal muscles; Patient-reported outcome measures; Psoas muscles; Spinal stenosis.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

None

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
The flowchart shows the patient selection process. SST Spinal stenosis trial, NORDSTEN Norwegian degenerative spondylolisthesis and spinal stenosis
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Axial T2-weighted magnetic resonance image obtained at the level of the upper endplate of L3. The muscle fat index (MFI) was calculated by dividing the mean signal intensity of the psoas major (PM) with the mean signal intensity of the erector spinae (ES) and the multifidus (MF) muscles
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Bland-Altman plots with mean differences in measurements of the muscle fat index (MFI, solid lines) and 95% limits of agreement (dashed lines) between observers 1 and 2 (a), observers 1 and 3 (b), and observers 2 and 3 (c)
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
Bland-Altman plots with mean differences in measurements of the muscle fat index (MFI, solid lines) and 95% limits of agreement (dashed lines) for repeated measurements by observer 1 (a), observer 2 (b), and observer 3 (c)

References

    1. Genevay S, Atlas SJ. Lumbar spinal stenosis. Best Pract Res Clin Rheumatol. 2010;24:253–265. doi: 10.1016/j.berh.2009.11.001. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Katz JN, Harris MB. Clinical practice. Lumbar spinal stenosis. N Engl J Med. 2008;358:818–825. doi: 10.1056/NEJMcp0708097. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Chen YY, Pao JL, Liaw CK, Hsu WL, Yang RS. Image changes of paraspinal muscles and clinical correlations in patients with unilateral lumbar spinal stenosis. Eur Spine J. 2014;23:999–1006. doi: 10.1007/s00586-013-3148-z. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Yarjanian JA, Fetzer A, Yamakawa KS, Tong HC, Smuck M, Haig A. Correlation of paraspinal atrophy and denervation in back pain and spinal stenosis relative to asymptomatic controls. PM R. 2013;5:39–44. doi: 10.1016/j.pmrj.2012.08.017. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Kalimo H, Rantanen J, Viljanen T, Einola S. Lumbar muscles: structure and function. Ann Med. 1989;21:353–359. doi: 10.3109/07853898909149220. - DOI - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources