Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Dec;29(6):2211-2218.
doi: 10.3758/s13423-022-02149-2. Epub 2022 Jul 19.

Does taking multiple photos lead to a photo-taking-impairment effect?

Affiliations

Does taking multiple photos lead to a photo-taking-impairment effect?

Julia S Soares et al. Psychon Bull Rev. 2022 Dec.

Abstract

The photo-taking-impairment effect is observed when photographed information is less likely to be remembered than nonphotographed information. Three experiments examined whether this effect persists when multiple photos are taken. Experiment 1 used a within-subjects laboratory-based design in which participants viewed images of paintings and were instructed to photograph them once, five times, or not at all. Participants' memory was measured using a visual detail test, and the photo-taking-impairment effect was observed when participants took multiple photos. Experiment 2 examined the photo-taking-impairment effect using a between-subjects design. Participants either photographed all of the paintings they saw once, five times, or not at all, before being tested on their memory for the paintings. The photo-taking-impairment effect was observed in both photo-taking conditions relative to the no photo baseline. Experiment 3 replicated this pattern of results even when participants who took multiple photos were instructed to take five unique photos. These findings indicate that the photo-taking-impairment effect is robust, occurring even when multiple photos are taken, and after nonselective photo-taking.

Keywords: Cognitive offloading; Distributed cognition; Extended memory; Photo-taking-impairment effect.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Mean Memory Performance Across Conditions in Experiments 1–3. Note. Performance on a multiple-choice visual detail memory test across Experiments 1–3. Since four answer options were available for each test question, chance performance was 25%. The Observe condition consisted of questions about paintings that were only observed, while the 1-Photo and 5-Photos conditions consisted of questions about paintings photographed once or five times, respectively. Error bars indicate standard error of the mean.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Barasch A, Diehl K, Silverman J, Zauberman G. Photographic memory: The effects of volitional photo taking on memory for visual and auditory aspects of an experience. Psychological Science. 2017;28(8):1056–1066. doi: 10.1177/0956797617694868. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Coverdale ME, Nairne JS. The mnemonic effect of choice. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review. 2019;26(4):1310–1316. doi: 10.3758/s13423-019-01575-z. - DOI - PubMed
    1. D’Agostino PR, DeRemer P. Repetition effects as a function of rehearsal and encoding variability. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior. 1973;12(1):108–113. doi: 10.1016/S0022-5371(73)80066-0. - DOI
    1. Estes WK. Toward a statistical theory of learning. Psychological Review. 1950;57(2):94–107. doi: 10.1037/h0058559. - DOI
    1. Finley JR, Naaz F, Goh FW. Results: Behaviors and experiences with internal and external memory. In: Finley JR, Naaz F, Goh FW, editors. Memory and technology: How we use information in the brain and the world. Springer International Publishing; 2018. pp. 25–48.

LinkOut - more resources