Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Jul 19;22(1):189.
doi: 10.1186/s12911-022-01928-0.

Obtaining patients' medical history using a digital device prior to consultation in primary care: study protocol for a usability and validity study

Affiliations

Obtaining patients' medical history using a digital device prior to consultation in primary care: study protocol for a usability and validity study

Klara Albrink et al. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. .

Abstract

Background: With the help of digital tools patients' medical histories can be collected quickly and transferred into their electronic medical records. This information can facilitate treatment planning, reduce documentation work, and improve care. However, it is still unclear whether the information collected from patients in this way is reliable. In this study, we assess the accuracy of the information collected by patients using an app for medical history taking by comparing it with the information collected in a face-to-face medical interview. We also study the app's usability from the patients' point of view and analysing usage data.

Methods: We developed a software application (app) for symptom-oriented medical history taking specialized for general practice. Medical history taking will take place involving patients with acute somatic or psychological complaints (1) using the app and (2) verbally with trained study staff. To assess the perceived usability, patients will complete a questionnaire for the System Usability Scale. We will collect sociodemographic data, information about media use and health literacy, and app usage data.

Discussion: Digital tools offer the opportunity to improve patient care. However, it is not self-evident that the medical history taken by digital tools corresponds to the medical history that would be taken in an interview. If simply due to a design flaw patients answer questions about signs and symptoms that indicate possible serious underlying conditions 'wrong', this could have severe consequences. By additionally assessing the app's usability as perceived by a diverse group of patients, potential weaknesses in content, design and navigation can be identified and subsequently improved. This is essential in order to ensure that the app meets the need of different groups of patients. Trial registration German Clinical Trials Register DRKS00026659 , registered Nov 03 2021. World Health Organization Trial Registration Data Set, https://trialsearch.who.int/Trial2.aspx? TrialID = DRKS00026659.

Keywords: App; Digital medical history taking; Primary care; User friendliness.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Screenshots of the app (iPad mini). (The figure was created with PowerPoint by Microsoft Office Professional Plus 2016)
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Examples of independent questions and questions triggered by former answers using the example of the complaint ‘back pain’ ①.② Patients who specify the pain as ‘radiating’ are asked to which region of the body the pain radiates to. ③ The question about the intensity of pain during certain activities is again independent of the previous questions. (The figure was created with PowerPoint by Microsoft Office Professional Plus 2016
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Course of the data collection. (The figure was created with PowerPoint by Microsoft Office Professional Plus 2016, partly using icons from Noun Project (https://thenounproject.com; patient by Minh DoVN, Reception by ibrandify PK, waiting room by Aficons ID, iPad by Andrey Vasiliev RU, Interview by Cuputo ID, euro payment by b farias CL.)

References

    1. Irving G, Neves AL, Dambha-Miller H, Oishi A, Tagashira H, Verho A, Holden J. International variations in primary care physician consultation time: a systematic review of 67 countries. BMJ Open. 2017;7:e017902. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-017902. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Hampton JR, Harrison MJ, Mitchell JR, Prichard JS, Seymour C. Relative contributions of history-taking, physical examination, and laboratory investigation to diagnosis and management of medical outpatients. BMJ. 1975;2:486–489. doi: 10.1136/bmj.2.5969.486. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Roshan M, Rao AP. A study on relative contributions of the history, physical examination and investigations in making medical diagnosis. J Assoc Physicians India. 2000;48:771–775. - PubMed
    1. Brandberg H, Kahan T, Spaak J, Sundberg K, Koch S, Adeli A, et al. A prospective cohort study of self-reported computerised medical history taking for acute chest pain: protocol of the CLEOS-chest pain danderyd study (CLEOS-CPDS) BMJ Open. 2020;10:e031871. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-031871. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Almario CV, Chey W, Kaung A, Whitman C, Fuller G, Reid M, et al. Computer-generated vs. physician-documented history of present illness (HPI): results of a blinded comparison. Am J Gastroenterol. 2015;110:170–179. doi: 10.1038/ajg.2014.356. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

Associated data

LinkOut - more resources