The clinical outcomes of arthroscopic hip labral repair: a comparison between athletes and non-athletes

Abstract

The objective of this study is to compare the clinical outcomes after arthroscopic hip labral repair in athletes and non-athletes. The design of this study is a retrospective comparative study. The setting of this study is an institutional study. One hundred and sixteen patients of hip labral tears who underwent arthroscopic labral repair were included. Eighty-five of these patients met the inclusion/exclusion criteria (25 athletes and 60 non-athletes). Hip labral tears underwent arthroscopic labral repair. The main outcome measures are as follows: visual analog scale (VAS) and modified Harris Hip Score (mHHS) 2 years postoperatively and the rate of return to sports at previous level. There was no significant difference in the gender, alpha angle, lateral center-edge angle between the two groups, except for the mean age (19.3 versus 42.2, P < 0.001), Marx activity rating scale (MARS) (14.6 versus 6.8, P < 0.001) and University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA) activity rating scale (9.6 versus 5.0, P < 0.001). The intraoperative findings were similar in the two groups. The VAS scores and mHHS both showed a significant improvement after surgery in both groups (VAS improvement 3.6 and mHHS improvement 22.4 in the athlete group; VAS improvement 3.9 and mHHS improvement 25.0 in the non-athlete group, all P < 0.001). There was no difference in VAS improvement or mHHS improvement between the athlete and non-athlete groups. All the patients in the athlete group return to sports at previous level 6 months after the operation. The mean time of return to sports at previous level was 5.4 months. Both athletes and non-athletes demonstrate significant VAS and mHHS improvement following arthroscopic labral repair. The VAS scores improvement and mHHS improvement were similar in the athlete and non-athlete groups after arthroscopic labral repair.

Fig. 1.

Patient enrollment flow diagram.