Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Jul 4;2022(3):hoac028.
doi: 10.1093/hropen/hoac028. eCollection 2022.

The forgotten group of donor-conceived persons

Affiliations

The forgotten group of donor-conceived persons

Guido Pennings. Hum Reprod Open. .

Abstract

A forgotten group of donor-conceived persons is those who believe that gamete donation is morally wrong and should be prohibited. Although they share the two main arguments with the anti-anonymity group, i.e. the psychological harm as a consequence of lacking the necessary information for identity construction, and the violation of a fundamental human right, namely the right to be cared for by one's genetic parents, their voices are largely ignored in the debate. The anti-donation group also has a large part of the ideology of the family in common with the anti-anonymity group. The paper concludes that the anti-donation position should be accepted as an equivalent position. Moreover, given the similarities between the two positions, people who accept the claims of the anti-anonymity donor-conceived persons should explain why the claims of the anti-donation group should not be honoured.

Keywords: anonymity; donor offspring; donor-conceived persons; ethics; family; human right; ideology; oocyte donation; psychological harm; sperm donation.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Adams DH. Conceptualising a child-centric paradigm. Do we have freedom of choice in donor conception reproduction? J Bioeth Inq 2013;10:369–381. - PubMed
    1. Appleton SF. Between the binaries: exploring the legal boundaries of nonanonymous sperm donation. Fam Law Quart 2015;48:93–115.
    1. Archard D. The future of the family. Ethics Soc Welfare 2012;6:132–142.
    1. Besson S. Enforcing the child’s right to know her origins: contrasting approaches under the Convention on the rights of the child and the European Convention on human rights. Int J Law Policy Fam 2007;21:137–159.
    1. Blyth E, Kramer W. ‘My daddy’s name is Donor’: Read with Caution. Bionews 9 July 2010. 2010. https://www.bionews.org.uk/page_92455 (15 December 2021, date last accessed).

LinkOut - more resources