Production cow-calf responses from perennial forage-based and integrated beef-cropping systems
- PMID: 35854967
- PMCID: PMC9290964
- DOI: 10.1093/tas/txac090
Production cow-calf responses from perennial forage-based and integrated beef-cropping systems
Abstract
An experiment was conducted to measure production responses of an alternative cow-calf production system integrated into a cropping system without access to perennial forage compared to a traditional cow-calf system utilizing perennial forage. Multiparous, cross-bred beef cows (n = 160; average age = 6.2 ± 2.8 yr) were utilized in a randomized complete block experimental design and unstructured treatment design. Upon initiation, cows were blocked by age and stratified by source, assigned randomly to one of two production systems, each with four replicates (n = 20 cows/replicate). Once allotted to their treatment groups, cows remained in their experimental units for the duration of the experiment. Treatments were: 1) a traditional system consisting of April to May calving with smooth bromegrass pasture and grazed corn residue as forage resources (TRAD); 2) an alternative system consisting of July to August calving utilizing partial-drylot feeding, summer-planted oats, and corn residue grazing (ALT). There were no differences (P ≥ 0.27) in calving rates (91.8 vs. 86.7 ± 2.92%), pregnancy rates (89.3 vs. 89.9 ± 2.66%), and weaning rates (87.2 vs. 82.3 ± 3.29%) for TRAD vs. ALT, respectively. However, there was an increase (P = 0.04) in the rate of twin offspring in ALT (2.9 vs. 9.4 ± 2.36% for TRAD vs. ALT, respectively). One calf from the set of twins was selected randomly at birth to be removed from the experiment, so the production data are only from single calves. There was no difference (P = 0.47) in calf body weight at birth (40 vs. 39 ± 0.7 kg for TRAD vs. ALT, respectively). At weaning, calves in the ALT system were lighter (P < 0.01) at the same day of age (184 vs. 229 ± 5.5 kg) compared to TRAD calves. Cows from the ALT system had fewer (P < 0.01) kg weaned per cow exposed to bull (150 vs. 199 ± 7.2 kg) compared to TRAD cows. Apart from the twinning rate, no differences in reproductive performance were observed among systems. However, reduced weaning weights and kilogram of weaned calf per cow exposed may negatively impact revenue to the cow-calf enterprise of the ALT system.
Keywords: annual forage; beef cow; drylot; limit-feeding; partial-confinement; systems.
© The Author(s) 2022. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the American Society of Animal Science.
Figures








Similar articles
-
Evaluation of growth performance, carcass characteristics, and methane and CO2 emissions of growing and finishing cattle raised in extensive or partial-intensive cow-calf production systems.J Anim Sci. 2023 Jan 3;101:skac368. doi: 10.1093/jas/skac368. J Anim Sci. 2023. PMID: 36592745 Free PMC article.
-
Productivity and hay requirements of beef cattle in a Midwestern year-round grazing system.J Anim Sci. 2004 Aug;82(8):2503-15. doi: 10.2527/2004.8282503x. J Anim Sci. 2004. PMID: 15318752
-
Effects of early or conventional weaning on beef cow and calf performance in pasture or drylot environments.Transl Anim Sci. 2022 Apr 27;6(2):txac052. doi: 10.1093/tas/txac052. eCollection 2022 Apr. Transl Anim Sci. 2022. PMID: 35663615 Free PMC article.
-
Review: A hierarchical research model to foster dialog between grazing ecology and beef cow energetics to support ecological intensification of native grassland.Animal. 2024 Nov 17:101372. doi: 10.1016/j.animal.2024.101372. Online ahead of print. Animal. 2024. PMID: 39884934 Review.
-
Impacts of dairy cow nutrition precalving on calf health.JDS Commun. 2023 Feb 24;4(3):245-249. doi: 10.3168/jdsc.2022-0281. eCollection 2023 May. JDS Commun. 2023. PMID: 37360121 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
Evaluation of growth performance, carcass characteristics, and methane and CO2 emissions of growing and finishing cattle raised in extensive or partial-intensive cow-calf production systems.J Anim Sci. 2023 Jan 3;101:skac368. doi: 10.1093/jas/skac368. J Anim Sci. 2023. PMID: 36592745 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Adams, D. C., Clark R. T., Klopfenstein T. J., and Volesky J. D.. . 1996. Matching the cow with forage resources. Rangelands 18:57–62. https://www.jstor.org/stable/4001117.
-
- Anderson, V. L., Ilse B. R., and Engel C. L.. . 2013. Drylot vs. pasture beef cow-calf production: three-year progress report. NDSU Beef Report. 13–16. https://www.ag.ndsu.edu/livestockextension/research-reports/2013-beef-ca....
-
- Anderson, L. K., Blanco-Canqui H., Drewnoski M. E., MacDonald J. C., Carslon Z., Hansen B. H., Brinton M. M., Ulmer K. M., and Calus K. J.. . 2022. Cover crop grazing impacts on soil properties and crop yields under irrigated no-till corn-soybean management. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 86:118–133. doi:10.1002/saj2.20358. - DOI
-
- ANKOM Technology. 2017. Method for determining acid detergent fiber, ANKOM 200/220 fiber analyzer. Fairport (NY): ANCOM Technology.
-
- AOAC International. 1999. Official methods of analysis. 16th ed. Arlington (VA): AOAC Int.
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Miscellaneous