Usefulness of regional bone measurements in patients with osteoporotic fractures of the spine and distal forearm
- PMID: 3585503
Usefulness of regional bone measurements in patients with osteoporotic fractures of the spine and distal forearm
Abstract
Bone mineral mass was measured in normal subjects and osteoporotic patients at two forearm sites (proximal and distal of the 8 mm site between the two forearm bones) by single photon absorptiometry and in the spine and whole body by dual photon absorptiometry. There were no signs of preferential low spinal bone mass in 28 patients with vertebral fractures. Their bone mass was at all sites 26% to 37% lower than the premenopausal mean value and 7% to 13% lower than in age-matched normal women. In 45 patients with forearm fractures bone reduction was also universal but only 3% to 6% lower than in healthy women of comparable age. The spinal bone mass in all the patients was significantly related to both forearm measurements with coefficients of correlation of 0.58-0.61 and s.e.e. of 18%. Compared to the premenopausal normal range the distal forearm site had a greater sensitivity in identifying patients with vertebral fractures than had the spinal measurement (chi-square test, p less than 0.01). We thus conclude that patients with vertebral fractures have universal osteoporosis and that measurement of spinal BMC had no predictive advantages over that of the forearm bone mass for population studies.
Similar articles
-
Differential changes in bone mineral density of the appendicular and axial skeleton with aging: relationship to spinal osteoporosis.J Clin Invest. 1981 Feb;67(2):328-35. doi: 10.1172/JCI110039. J Clin Invest. 1981. PMID: 7462421 Free PMC article.
-
The diagnostic validity of local and total bone mineral measurements in postmenopausal osteoporosis and osteoarthritis.Clin Endocrinol (Oxf). 1986 Dec;25(6):711-20. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2265.1986.tb03627.x. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf). 1986. PMID: 3652471
-
[Comparative bone density measurements in healthy women and women with osteoporosis].Radiologe. 1988 Apr;28(4):153-60. Radiologe. 1988. PMID: 3289080 Review. German.
-
A model for involutional bone loss.J Lab Clin Med. 1985 Dec;106(6):630-7. J Lab Clin Med. 1985. PMID: 4067377
-
Whole bone geometry and bone quality in distal forearm fracture.J Orthop Trauma. 2008 Sep;22(8 Suppl):S59-65. doi: 10.1097/BOT.0b013e318162ab25. J Orthop Trauma. 2008. PMID: 18753891 Review.
Cited by
-
Sensitivity of dual-photon absorptiometry in spinal osteoporosis.Calcif Tissue Int. 1988 Dec;43(6):329-34. doi: 10.1007/BF02553274. Calcif Tissue Int. 1988. PMID: 3146420
-
Bone changes in postmenopausal Spanish women.Calcif Tissue Int. 1993 Feb;52(2):103-6. doi: 10.1007/BF00308317. Calcif Tissue Int. 1993. PMID: 8443684
-
The reproducibility of single photon absorptiometry in a clinical setting.Eur J Nucl Med. 1989;15(5):269-73. doi: 10.1007/BF00257547. Eur J Nucl Med. 1989. PMID: 2759128
-
Single X-ray absorptiometry: performance characteristics and comparison with single photon absorptiometry.Osteoporos Int. 1995;5(5):377-81. doi: 10.1007/BF01622260. Osteoporos Int. 1995. PMID: 8800788
-
Does a single local absorptiometric bone measurement indicate the overall skeletal status? Implications for osteoporosis and osteoarthritis of the hip.Clin Rheumatol. 1990 Jun;9(2):193-203. doi: 10.1007/BF02031968. Clin Rheumatol. 1990. PMID: 2390848
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical