The need for an institution-specific normal pressure hydrocephalus management protocol
- PMID: 35855146
- PMCID: PMC9282768
- DOI: 10.25259/SNI_293_2022
The need for an institution-specific normal pressure hydrocephalus management protocol
Abstract
Background: Despite the publication of international guidelines, the management of normal pressure hydrocephalus (NPH) varies due to clinician preference and varying clinical evidence. An audit was performed to review the current pathways used in clinical practice with the aim of formulating an institution-specific protocol to optimize and standardize care.
Methods: An internal audit was performed on the management of patients with NPH who presented to the Princess Alexandra Hospital, Brisbane between January 2016 and February 2019.
Results: Forty-one patients were included in the study. Lumbar puncture (LP) was the main diagnostic test used (63.4%). About 14.6% underwent lumbar drain (LD) insertion instead. About 12.2% did not undergo either LP or LD before definitive treatment. Only 60% of all patients underwent ventriculoperitoneal shunt insertion. Overall, five treatment pathways were noted. LP + VP shunt showed the greatest average improvement in Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) or Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) (+3.8 ± 3.18), followed by LD + VP shunt (+3.25 ± 3.52) and sole treatment with LP (+1.83 ± 1.18). Both pre and post intervention assessment of gait and cognition were only performed in 31% and 48.8% of patients, respectively. Four types of cognitive assessment were used (MOCA 46.4%, MMSE 46.4%, Rowland Universal Dementia Assessment Scale 3.6%, and Addenbrooke's Cognitive Examination-III 3.6%). MoCA showed greater cognition improvement (2.07) compared to MMSE (1.3) post intervention. There was no consistent objective gait assessment test used.
Conclusion: The multiple NPH treatment pathways, low rate of pre and post objective symptom assessment, and lack of standardized gait and cognitive assessment tests demonstrate a clear need for an institution-specific NPH management protocol to standardize diagnostic workup, definitive management, and allied health assessment.
Keywords: Diagnosis; Normal pressure hydrocephalus; Protocol; Treatment.
Copyright: © 2022 Surgical Neurology International.
Conflict of interest statement
There are no conflicts of interest.
Figures
References
-
- Bergsneider M, Black PM, Klinge P, Marmarou A, Relkin N. Surgical management of idiopathic normal-pressure hydrocephalus. Neurosurgery. 2005;57(Suppl 3):S29–39. discussion ii-v. - PubMed
-
- Bräutigam K, Vakis A, Tsitsipanis C. pathogenesis of idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus: A review of knowledge. J Clin Neurosci. 2019;61:10–3. - PubMed
-
- Fleming WB, Xerri J, Tailor P, Raman A. Proposed guidelines for the assessment and management of idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus in the United Kingdom. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2012;83:A10.
-
- Graff-Radford N. Normal Pressure Hydrocephalus. 2019. Available from: https://www.uptodate.com/contents/normal-pressure-hydrocephalus [Last accessed 2019 Aug 06]
-
- Ishikawa M, Guideline Committe for Idiopathic Normal Pressure Hydrocephalus, Japanese Society of Normal Pressure Hydrocephalus Clinical guidelines for idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus. Neurol Med Chir (Tokyo) 2004;44:222–3. - PubMed
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Research Materials