Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2022 Jul 11;13(4):1183-1195.
doi: 10.14336/AD.2021.1209.

Current Animal Model Systems for Ovarian Aging Research

Affiliations
Review

Current Animal Model Systems for Ovarian Aging Research

Huan Lu et al. Aging Dis. .

Abstract

Ovarian aging leads to menopause, loss of fertility and other disorders in multiple organs, which brings great distress to women. For ethical reasons, it is impossible to use humans as direct study subjects for aging research. Therefore, biomedical researchers have employed different non-human organisms to study ovarian aging, including worms, fruit flies, fishes, amphibians, birds, mice, rats, cavies, rabbits, pigs, sheep, cows, horses, monkeys, and apes. Because each of these model organisms has its own features, multiple factors, such as size, anatomical structure, cost, ease of operation, fertility, generation time, lifespan, and gene heredity, should be carefully considered when selecting a model system to study ovarian aging. An appropriate model organism would help researchers explore the risk factors and elucidate molecular mechanisms underlying declined ovarian functions, which might be conducive to preventing or delaying the ovarian aging process. This article will offer an overview on several currently available and commonly used model organisms for ovarian aging research by comparing their pros and cons. In doing so, we hope to provide useful information for ovarian aging researchers.

Keywords: animal model systems; model organisms; ovarian aging.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests The authors declare that there are no competing interests.

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Pros and cons of each model animal in ovarian aging research. Created with from biorender.com.

References

    1. López-Otín C, Blasco MA, Partridge L, Serrano M, Kroemer G (2013). The hallmarks of aging. Cell, 153:1194-1217. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Zhang J, Chen Q, Du D, Wu T, Wen J, Wu M, et al. (2019). Can ovarian aging be delayed by pharmacological strategies? Aging, 11:817-832. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Spears N, Lopes F, Stefansdottir A, Rossi V, De Felici M, Anderson RA, et al. (2019). Ovarian damage from chemotherapy and current approaches to its protection. Hum Reprod Update, 25:673-693. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Ruth KS, Day FR, Hussain J, Martínez-Marchal A, Aiken CE, Azad A, et al. (2021). Genetic insights into biological mechanisms governing human ovarian ageing. Nature, 596:393-397. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Chiang JL, Shukla P, Pagidas K, Ahmed NS, Karri S, Gunn DD, et al. (2020). Mitochondria in Ovarian Aging and Reproductive Longevity. Ageing Res Rev, 63:101168. - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources