Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2022 Sep 1;32(5):466-471.
doi: 10.1097/MOU.0000000000001029. Epub 2022 Jul 18.

Polygenic risk score in prostate cancer

Affiliations
Review

Polygenic risk score in prostate cancer

Jong Jin Oh et al. Curr Opin Urol. .

Abstract

Purpose of review: This study was conducted in order to review the outcomes regarding polygenic risk score (PRS) in prediction of prostate cancer (PCa). With the increasing proficiency of genetic analysis, assessment of PRS for prediction of PCa has been performed in numerous studies. Genetic risk prediction models for PCa that include hundreds to thousands of independent risk-associated variants are under development. For estimation of additive effect of multiple variants, the number of risk alleles carried by an individual is summed, and each variant is weighted according to its estimated effect size for generation of a PRS.

Recent findings: Currently, regarding the accuracy of PRS alone, PCa detection rate ranged from 0.56 to 0.67. A higher rate of accuracy of 0.866-0.880 was observed for other models combining PRS with established clinical markers. The results of PRS from Asian populations showed a level of accuracy that is somewhat low compared with values from Western populations (0.63-0.67); however, recent results from Asian cohorts were similar to that of Western counterparts. Here, we review current PRS literature and examine the clinical utility of PRS for prediction of PCa.

Summary: Emerging data from several studies regarding PRS in PCa could be the solution to adding predictive value to PCa risk estimation. Although commercial markers are available, development of a large-scale, well validated PRS model should be undertaken in the near future, in order to translate hypothetical scenarios to actual clinical practice.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Gandaglia G, Leni R, Bray F, et al. Epidemiology and prevention of prostate cancer. Eur Urol Oncol 2021; 4:877–892.
    1. Atere-Roberts J, Gray SC, Hall IJ, et al. Racial and ethnic disparities in health status, chronic conditions, and behavioral risk factors among prostate cancer survivors, United States, 2015. Prev Chronic Dis 2021; 18:E39.
    1. Byrne L, Toland AE. Polygenic risk scores in prostate cancer risk assessment and screening. Urol Clin North Am 2021; 48:387–399.
    1. Plym A, Penney KL, Kalia S, et al. Evaluation of a multiethnic polygenic risk score model for prostate cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst 2022; 114:771–774.
    1. Pernar CH, Ebot EM, Wilson KM, et al. The epidemiology of prostate cancer. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Med 2018; 8:a030387.

Publication types