Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Sep;15(9):1603-1608.
doi: 10.1002/aur.2782. Epub 2022 Jul 20.

Autistic people outperform neurotypicals in a cartoon version of the Reading the Mind in the Eyes

Affiliations

Autistic people outperform neurotypicals in a cartoon version of the Reading the Mind in the Eyes

Liam Cross et al. Autism Res. 2022 Sep.

Abstract

Prior research suggests that while autistic people may demonstrate poorer facial emotion recognition when stimuli are human, these differences lessen when stimuli are anthropomorphic. To investigate this further, this work explores emotion recognition in autistic and neurotypical adults (n = 196). Groups were compared on a standard and a cartoon version of the Reading the Mind in the Eyes test. Results indicated that autistic individuals were not significantly different from neurotypicals on the standard version. However, autistic people outperformed neurotypicals on the cartoon version. The implications for these findings regarding emotion recognition deficits and the social motivation account of autism are discussed and support the view of socio-cognitive differences rather than deficits in this population. LAY SUMMARY: The Reading the Mind in the Eyes test and a cartoon version were tested on autistic and neurotypical adults. Autistic adults were not significantly different on the original test compared to neurotypicals, but they outperformed neurotypical adults on the cartoon version.

Keywords: Reading the Mind in the Eyes; anthropomorphism; autism; cartoon; emotion recognition.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare. All co‐authors have seen and agree with the manuscript's contents, and there is no financial interest to report. We certify that the submission is original work and is not under review at any other publication.

Figures

FIGURE 1
FIGURE 1
Practices item for the adapted Reading the Mind in the Eyes (RME) based on the original Baron‐Cohen et al. (2001) RME. The correct emotion is panicked, presented with the following three foils: jealous, arrogant, and hateful
FIGURE 2
FIGURE 2
Mean and standard errors for facial emotion recognition C/Reading the Mind in the Eyes proportion correct scores (left panel) and perceived difficulty (right panel) divided by ASCs and NTs.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Atherton, G. , & Cross, L. (2018). Seeing more than human: Anthropomorphic theory of mind and autism. Frontiers in Psychology, 9, 528. 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00528 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Atherton, G. , & Cross, L. (2019). Animal faux pas: Two legs good four legs bad for theory of mind, but not in the broad autism spectrum. The Journal of Genetic Psychology, 180(2–3), 81–95. 10.1080/00221325.2019.1593100 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Atherton, G. , & Cross, L. (2021). Reading the mind in cartoon eyes: A cartoon version of the RME. Psychological Reports, 125(3), 1380–1396. 10.1177/0033294120988135 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Atherton, G. , Edisbury, E. , Piovesan, A. , & Cross, L. (2022). ‘They ask no questions and pass no criticism’: A mixed‐methods study exploring pet ownership in autism. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 1–15. 10.1007/s10803-022-05622-y - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Atherton, G. , Lummis, B. , Day, S. X. , & Cross, L. (2018). What am I thinking? Perspective‐taking from the perspective of adolescents with autism. Autism, 23(5), 1186–1200. - PubMed