Evaluation of the implementation of a quality improvement program through morbidity and mortality reviews in a developing country
- PMID: 35855883
- PMCID: PMC9287764
- DOI: 10.1016/j.amsu.2022.103987
Evaluation of the implementation of a quality improvement program through morbidity and mortality reviews in a developing country
Abstract
Background: Morbidity and mortality reviews represent an opportunity to discuss adverse events and healthcare issues. Aim: Report the first experience of implementing a procedure of MMR, and assess its impact on quality improvement.
Methods: From July 2019 to December 2019, members of the surgical and ICU departments designed and implemented a regular procedure of MMR. Cases of severe postoperative complications after curative resection for digestive cancer were selected to be presented by a surgical resident and discussed in an interdisciplinary conference following a standardized presentation based on an analysis tool adapted from the ALARM framework. Process was assessed by the number of MMRs held, number and type of recommendations issued and implemented.
Results: Among 13 serious complications during the study period, 10 were discussed. The "Tasks" category was activated in 90% of the cases where lack or misuse of protocols was identified in 90% of the events discussed. Test results availability or accuracy were incarnated in 30% of cases. Poor communication was a contributing factor in 60% of the cases. Written medical records were defective in 40% of the cases. From 16 recommendations for improvement emitted, 87.5% (14/16) were translated into projects and successfully implemented.
Conclusions: a standardized and regular procedure of morbidity and mortality reviews in a tertiary care facility in a developing country allowed a significant improvement in patient care through quality initiatives implementation. MMRs might be a strong tool for the improvement of surgical care particularly for low-mid income countries.
Keywords: Implementation; MMR, Morbidity and mortality reviews; Morbidity mortality reviews; Patient safety; QI, Quality improvement; Quality improvement.
© 2022 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd on behalf of IJS Publishing Group Ltd.
Conflict of interest statement
All authors declare no conflict of interest.
References
-
- Chathampally Y., Cooper B., Wood D., Tudor G., Gottlieb M. Evolving from morbidity and mortality to a case-based error reduction conference: evidence-based best practices from the council of emergency medicine residency directors. West. J. Emerg. Med. 2020;21 doi: 10.5811/westjem.2020.7.47583. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
