Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Jul 2:35:100444.
doi: 10.1016/j.jbo.2022.100444. eCollection 2022 Aug.

MUTARS® Humero pro Femur replacement: A novel reconstructive procedure after malignant bone tumor resection of the femur in young children

Affiliations

MUTARS® Humero pro Femur replacement: A novel reconstructive procedure after malignant bone tumor resection of the femur in young children

Georg Gosheger et al. J Bone Oncol. .

Abstract

Limb-preserving surgery in young children suffering malignant bone tumor of the femur is challenging due to the specific anatomical conditions. Extendable tumor endoprostheses are often oversized, while custom-made endoprostheses do not provide the intraoperatively required variability regarding reconstruction length. Allo- and autograft replacements, on the other hand, show high complication and revision rates. We report a novel reconstructive procedure after resection of malignant bone tumors of the femur in young children, and present our preliminary results of this technique.

Keywords: Bone sarcoma; Ewing’s sarcoma; LLD, leg length discrepancy; MSTS, Musculoskeletal Tumor Society; MUTARS; Osteosarcoma; a.p., anteroposterior.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Patient 1. Female patient with Ewing’s sarcoma of the right femur (A. MRI, coronal view; B. radiograph, anteroposterior (a.p.) view). Total femur resection and MUTARS® Humero pro Femur reconstruction at the age of 3 years (C. a.p. view; D. lateral view). First revision with 10 mm lengthening of the modular prosthetic system 3 years after the initial surgery (E.). 5 years after tumor resection a triple osteotomy of the right pelvis was performed (F.). At the time of last follow-up at the age of 12 years the patient showed a remaining LLD of 13.5 cm (G.).
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Patient 2. Female patient with osteosarcoma of the left distal femur (A. MRI, coronal view; B. radiograph, a.p. view). Tumor resection and reconstruction of the distal femur and diaphysis was performed at the age of 8 years (C. a.p. view; D. lateral view; E. intraoperative view of the femoral reconstruction).
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Patient 3. Male patient with osteosarcoma of the right distal femur, presenting with pathological fracture of the distal femur at the time of initial consultation (A. a.p. view; B. lateral view). MUTARS® Humero pro Femur reconstruction was performed at the age of 4 years (C. a.p. view; D. lateral view; E. intraoperative view of femoral reconstruction).
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
Patient 4. Male patient with Ewing’s sarcoma of the right distal femur (A. a.p. view). MUTARS® Humero pro Femur reconstruction was performed at the age of 4 years (B., C. 2 years postoperatively, a.p. (B.) and lateral (C.) views). 2.5 cm LLD 3 years postoperatively (D. a.p. view).
Fig. 5
Fig. 5
Patient 5. Male patient with Ewing’s sarcoma of the left femur (A. a.p. view). After total femur resection, diaphyseal reconstruction was performed with a distractable vertebral body replacement, while the knee joint was reconstructed with an inverse humerus cap, a glenoid and a 40 mm glenosphere (B. a.p. view). 2 months after the initial reconstruction a revision surgery was performed with exchange of the prosthesis and implantation of a MUTARS® Humero pro Femur replacement; in this case, an ulna anchorage stem served as a tibial plateau (C. a.p. view; D. lateral view; E. intraoperative view of the femoral reconstruction).

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Windhager R., et al. Growing prostheses after sarcoma resection in children and adolescents. Orthopade. 2019;48(7):563–571. - PubMed
    1. Levin A.S., Arkader A., Morris C.D. Reconstruction following tumor resections in skeletally immature patients. J. Am. Acad. Orthop. Surg. 2017;25(3):204–213. - PubMed
    1. Pala E., et al. A long-term experience with Mutars tumor megaprostheses: analysis of 187 cases. Eur. J. Trauma Emerg. Surg. 2022;48(3):2483–2491. - PubMed
    1. Gilg M.M., et al. What is the morbidity of a non-invasive growing prosthesis? Bone Joint J. 2016;98-B(12):1697–1703. - PubMed
    1. Yoshida Y., Osaka S., Tokuhashi Y. Experience with extendable prostheses for malignant bone tumors in children. J. Formos. Med. Assoc. 2011;110(11):711–715. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources