Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Jul 9;8(7):e09914.
doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e09914. eCollection 2022 Jul.

Introducing surface-to-surface matching technique to evaluate mandibular symmetry: A retrospective study

Affiliations

Introducing surface-to-surface matching technique to evaluate mandibular symmetry: A retrospective study

Yajuan Xie et al. Heliyon. .

Abstract

Objectives: This study introduced a three-dimensional (3D) surface-to-surface matching technique to evaluate the mandibular symmetry of teenagers and adults with unilateral second molar scissor bite.

Methods: The targets came from 73 cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) images with unilateral second molar scissor bite, including teenagers (n = 30) and adults (n = 43). 73 images without scissor bite and matched in sex and age were selected as controls. The scans were developed into 3D mandible models and seven mandibular functional unit models, including condylar process (Co), coronoid process (Cr), mandibular ramus (Ra), mandibular angle (Ma), alveolar process (Ap), mandibular body (Mb) and chin process (Ch). The surface-to-surface matching technique was introduced. 3D deviation analysis and matching percentages calculation were performed and compared to evaluate the symmetry of the mandible.

Results: Comparisons were made between the study samples and control samples. For teenagers, the matching percentages of the entire mandible (55.31 ± 7.24%), Mb (69.04 ± 9.22%) and Co (65.19 ± 10.67%) in the study group were lower than that of the entire mandible (60.87 ± 6.38%) (P <0.01), Mb (75.0 ± 8.71%) (P <0.05) and Co (70.25 ± 8.20%) (P <0.05) in the control group. While Ap, Ra, Ch, Cr and Ma showed no statistically significant differences (P >0.05). For adults, the matching percentages of the entire mandible (48.88 ± 9.77%), Ap (65.83 ± 11.21%), Mb (64.43 ± 12.03%), Ch (79.17 ± 10.29%), Ra (64.11 ± 9.84%) and Co (61.08 ± 11.64%) in the study group were lower than the entire mandible (59.28 ± 5.49%) (P <0.01), Ap (73.65 ± 9.10%) (P <0.01), Mb (71.66 ± 8.40%) (P <0.01), Ch (83.86 ± 5.59%) (P <0.05), Ra (68.54 ± 7.87%) (P <0.05) and Co (66.20 ± 10.62%) (P <0.05) of the control group. Only Cr and Ma showed no statistically significant differences (P >0.05).

Conclusion: Mandibular asymmetry was observed in both teenagers and adults with unilateral second molar scissor bite. Moreover, compared with teenagers, more mandibular units of adult patients were affected.

Clinical significance: Based on the surface-to-surface matching technique, the symmetric and morphological information of the mandible can be converted into visual color maps and quantitative descriptions. This method can bring convenience to the study of the growth of mandible, orthodontic treatment and orthognathic surgery design.

Keywords: Cone-beam computed tomography; Scissor bite; Second molar; Three-dimensional imaging.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
The flow chart of the research.
Figure 2
Figure 2
(a) CBCT data was imported to the Mimics software. (b) The initial segmentation mask. (c) The mandible part was calculated. (d) The original mandible model was developed. (e) The mirrored mandible model was developed. (f) Best Fit Alignment.
Figure 3
Figure 3
3D Surface deviation analysis of mandibles. (a) teenager study group. (b) adult study group.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Mandibular functional units construction. Co, condylar process; Cr, coronoid process; Ra, mandibular ramus; Ma, mandibular angle; Ap, alveolar process; Mb, mandibular body; Ch, chin process.
Figure 5
Figure 5
3D Surface deviation analysis of mandibular functional units. Co, condylar process; Cr, coronoid process; Ra, mandibular ramus; Ma, mandibular angle; Ap, alveolar process; Mb, mandibular body; Ch, chin process.
Figure 6
Figure 6
Matching percentages of the mandibular functional units. The level of significance was set at 0.05. ∗ = p <0.05; ∗∗ = p <0.01.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Lipowicz A., Wolanski W., Kawlewska E., Zwolska P., Kulesa-Mrowiecka M., Dowgierd K., Linek P., Mysliwiec A. Evaluation of mandibular growth and symmetry in child with congenital zygomatic-coronoid ankylosis. Symmetry (Basel). 2021;13
    1. You K.-H., Kim K.-H., Lee K.-J., Baik H.-S. Three-dimensional computed tomography analysis of mandibular morphology in patients with facial asymmetry and mandibular retrognathism. Am. J. Orthod. Dentofacial Orthop. 2018;153:685–691. - PubMed
    1. Fan W., Gao D., Wang Y., Chen Y., Li Y., Lu S., Wang Z. Three-dimensional measurement and analysis of mandibular characteristics in subjects with impacted mandibular second molars. Orthod. Craniofac. Res. 2020;23:332–341. - PubMed
    1. Kazemipoor M., Valizadeh F., Jambarsang S. Three-dimensional pattern of inflammatory periapical lesion extension in the premolar's region: an application of K-means clustering. Curr Med Imaging. 2021;17:1151–1158. - PubMed
    1. Li C., Lin L., Zheng Z., Chung C.-H. A user-friendly protocol for mandibular segmentation of CBCT images for superimposition and internal structure analysis. J. Clin. Med. 2021;10:127. - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources