Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Dec;18(6):e2443.
doi: 10.1002/rcs.2443. Epub 2022 Aug 24.

Does the use of a uterine manipulator in robotic surgery for early-stage endometrial cancer affect oncological outcomes?

Hiroe Ito  1 , Tetsuya Moritake  1   2 , Keiichi Isaka  1   3
Affiliations

Does the use of a uterine manipulator in robotic surgery for early-stage endometrial cancer affect oncological outcomes?

Hiroe Ito et al. Int J Med Robot. 2022 Dec.

Abstract

Background: To investigate the impact of the use of a uterine manipulator in robot-assisted surgery for early-stage endometrial cancer on oncological outcome.

Methods: Eighty six robotic surgeries and sixty seven open surgeries were performed for early-stage endometrial cancer. Disease-free survival and overall survival at 5 years, and surgical results and postoperative complications were compared between surgeries. In robotic surgery, a uterine manipulator was used in all cases.

Results: There was no significant difference in oncological outcome between surgeries. Robotic surgery showed significantly longer operative time, less blood loss, and shorter hospital stay compared to open surgery. In robotic surgery, complications occurred significantly less frequently, and no patients required conversion to laparotomy. There were no clear correlations of positive lavage cytology with The International Federation of Gynecology nd Obstetrics stage, recurrence, and site of recurrence in either surgery.

Conclusions: The use of a uterine manipulator during robotic surgery for early-stage endometrial cancer did not influence recurrence or survival.

Keywords: endometrial cancer; oncological outcome; robotic surgery; uterine manipulator.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

References

REFERENCES

    1. Ramirez PT, Frumovitz M, Pareja R, et al. Minimally invasive versus abdominal radical hysterectomy for cervical cancer. N Engl J Med. 2018;379(20):1895-1904. https://doi.org/10.1056/nejmoa1806395
    1. Kohler C, Hertel H, Herrmann J, et al. Laparoscopic radical hysterectomy with transvaginal closure of vaginal cuff - a multicenter analysis. Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2019;29(5):845-850. https://doi.org/10.1136/ijgc-2019-000388
    1. Kanao H, Matsuo K, Aoki Y, et al. Feasibility and outcome of total laparoscopic radical hysterectomy with no-look no-touch technique for FIGO IB1 cervical cancer. J Gynecol Oncol. 2019;30(3):e71. https://doi.org/10.3802/jgo.2019.30.e71
    1. Walker JL, Piedmonte MR, Spirtos NM, et al. Recurrence and survival after random assignment to laparoscopy versus laparotomy for comprehensive surgical staging of uterine cancer: Gynecologic Oncology Group LAP2 Study. J Clin Oncol. 2012;30(7):695-700. https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2011.38.8645
    1. Gauthier T, Lacorre A, Sallee C, et al. Impact of the LACC study. A SFOG survey. Bull Cancer. 2020;107(5):551-555. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bulcan.2020.02.012

LinkOut - more resources