Patient selection for spinal cord stimulation: The importance of an integrated assessment of clinical and psychosocial factors
- PMID: 35856311
- DOI: 10.1002/ejp.2009
Patient selection for spinal cord stimulation: The importance of an integrated assessment of clinical and psychosocial factors
Abstract
Background: A previously developed educational e-health tool considers both clinical and psychosocial factors when selecting patients with chronic pain for spinal cord stimulation (SCS). The validity of the composite recommendations was evaluated in a retrospective study, demonstrating a strong relationship with patient outcomes after SCS.
Methods: An additional retrospective analysis was performed to determine the added value of a psychosocial evaluation as part of the decision-making process on SCS. Data concerned 482 patients who were considered for SCS in 2018-2019. The analysis focused on the relationship between the different layers of the tool recommendations (clinical, psychosocial, composite) with trial results and patient outcomes at 6 months after SCS. Of the initial study population, 381 patients underwent SCS and had follow-up data on at least one of three pain-related outcome measures.
Results: Pain improvement was observed in 76% of the patients for whom SCS was strongly recommended based on merely the clinical aspects. This percentage varied by the level of psychosocial problems and ranged from 86% in patients without any compromising psychosocial factors to 60% in those with severe problems. Similarly, the severity of psychosocial problems affected trial results in patients for whom SCS was either recommended or strongly recommended.
Conclusions: The strong relationship between psychosocial factors embedded in the SCS e-health tool and patient outcomes supports an integrated and multidisciplinary approach in the selection of patients for SCS. The educational e-health tool, combining both clinical and psychosocial aspects, is believed to be helpful for further education and implementation of this approach.
Significance statement: This study confirms the relevance of the psychosocial factors embedded in the educational SCS e-health tool (https://scstool.org/). The strong relationship between the severity of psychosocial factors with patient outcomes supports conducting a comprehensive psychological and behavioural assessment when determining the eligibility of patients for SCS.
© 2022 The Authors. European Journal of Pain published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of European Pain Federation - EFIC ®.
References
REFERENCES
-
- Block, A. R., Marek, R. J., Ben-Porath, Y. S., & Kukal, D. (2017). Associations between pre-implant psychosocial factors and spinal cord stimulation outcome: Evaluation using the MMPI-2-RF. Assessment, 24, 60-70. https://doi.org/10.1177/1073191115601518
-
- Burchiel, K. J., Anderson, V. C., Wilson, B. J., Denison, D. B., Olson, K. A., & Shatin, D. (1995). Prognostic factors of spinal cord stimulation for chronic back and leg pain. Neurosurgery, 36(6), 1101-1110. https://doi.org/10.1227/00006123-199506000-00006
-
- Burke, A. L. J., Mathias, J. L., & Denson, L. A. (2015). Psychological functioning of people living with chronic pain: A meta-analytic review. Britsh Journal of Clinical Psychololgy, 54, 345-360. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjc.12078
-
- Campbell, C. M., Jamison, R. N., & Edwards, R. R. (2013). Psychological screening/phenotyping as predictors for spinal cord stimulation. Current Pain and Headache Reports, 17, 307. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11916-012-0307-6
-
- De La Cruz, P., Fama, C., Roth, S., Haller, J., Wilock, M., Lange, S., & Pilitsis, J. (2015). Predictors of spinal cord stimulation success. Neuromodulation, 18, 599-602. https://doi.org/10.1111/ner.12325
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
