Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Nov 1;47(21):1532-1540.
doi: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000004417. Epub 2022 Jun 30.

Spinal Cord Injury: The Global Incidence, Prevalence, and Disability From the Global Burden of Disease Study 2019

Weizhong Ding  1 , Shian Hu, Pengju Wang, Honglei Kang, Renpeng Peng, Yimin Dong, Feng Li
Affiliations

Spinal Cord Injury: The Global Incidence, Prevalence, and Disability From the Global Burden of Disease Study 2019

Weizhong Ding et al. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). .

Abstract

Study design: A retrospective cohort study.

Objective: The authors aimed to estimate the incidence, prevalence and years lived with disability (YLDs) of spinal cord injury (SCI) by location, sex, age, injury site and socio-demographic index (SDI) based on the data of the Global Burden of Disease Study (GBD) 2019.

Summary of background data: GBD 2019 estimates the burden of 369 diseases and injuries worldwide in 2019 and the temporal trends in the past 30 years. SCI is estimated as a result of injury from various causes.

Methods: A Bayesian meta-regression tool, DisMod-MR2.1, was used to produce the estimates. Estimated annual percentage change (EAPC) was calculated based on a linear regression mode of the age standardized rates and the calendar year to represent the temporal trends of the age standardized rates. Spearman rank order correlation was used to determine the correlation between SDI and the incidence and burden of SCI.

Results: Globally, there were 0.9 [95% uncertainty interval (UI), 0.7 to 1.2] million incident cases, 20.6 (95% UI, 18.9-23.6) million prevalent cases and 6.2 (95% UI, 4.5-8.2) million YLDs of total SCI in 2019. The ASPR increased (EAPC, 0.1; 95% confidence interval, -0.01 to 0.2), while the age standardized incidence rate (ASIR) (EAPC, -0.08; 95% UI, -0.24 to 0.09) and age standardized YLD rate (ASYR) (EAPC, -0.08; 95% confidence interval, -0.24 to 0.09) decreased. Males had higher ASIR and ASYR, and the rate of incidence, prevalence and YLD increased with age. Spinal injuries at neck level caused higher ASYR than injuries below neck level. A positive correlation existed between SDI and ASIR (ρ=0.1626, P <0.05), while a negative correlation was observed between SDI and EAPC of ASYR (ρ=-0.2421, P <0.01).

Conclusion: Conclusively, the incidence and burden of SCI has increased over the last 30 years. Males and the elderly were affected to a greater degree than females and younger individuals.

Level of evidence: Level III.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors report no conflicts of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
ASIR (A) and ASPR (B) of spinal cord injury in 2019 in 204 countries and territories, for both sexes. ASIR indicates age standardized incidence rate; ASPR, age standardized prevalence rate.
Figure 2
Figure 2
ASYR of spinal cord injury in 2019 in 204 countries and territories, for both sexes. ASYR indicates age standardized YLD rate; YLD, years lived with disability.
Figure 3
Figure 3
(A-D) The correlation between age standardized incidence rate, age standardized YLD rate, EAPC of spinal cord injury, and SDI. EAPC indicates estimated annual percentage change; SDI, socio-demographic index; YLD, years lived with disability.
Figure 4
Figure 4
(A-D) ASIR and years lived with disability rate of spinal cord injury by sexes and injury sites from 1990 to 2019. ASIR indicates age standardized incidence rate; ASPR, age standardized prevalence rate.
Figure 5
Figure 5
(A-F) The incidence, prevalence and YLD rate of spinal cord injury at all ages by sexes and injury sites in 2019. YLD indicates years lived with disability.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Comment in

References

    1. Hamid R, Averbeck MA, Chiang H, et al. . Epidemiology and pathophysiology of neurogenic bladder after spinal cord injury. World J Urol. 2018;36:1517–1527. - PubMed
    1. Holmes D. Spinal-cord injury: spurring regrowth. Nature. 2017;552:S49. - PubMed
    1. Zamarioli A, de Andrade Staut C, Volpon JB. Review of secondary causes of osteoporotic fractures due to diabetes and spinal cord injury. Curr Osteoporos Rep. 2020;18:148–156. - PubMed
    1. Sachdeva R, Gao F, Chan CCH, et al. . Cognitive function after spinal cord injury: a systematic review. Neurology. 2018;91:611–621. - PMC - PubMed
    1. James SL, Theadom A, Ellenbogen RG, et al. . Global, regional, and national burden of traumatic brain injury and spinal cord injury, 1990–2016: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2016. The Lancet Neurology. 2019;18:56–87. - PMC - PubMed