Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Jul 20;17(7):e0270225.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0270225. eCollection 2022.

Measuring extremist archetypes: Scale development and validation

Affiliations

Measuring extremist archetypes: Scale development and validation

Milan Obaidi et al. PLoS One. .

Erratum in

Abstract

Previous work has often disregarded the psychological heterogeneity of violent extremists. This research aimed to contribute to a more nuanced understanding of the psychological diversity of violent extremists. Based on qualitative work, we developed and validated the Extremist Archetypes Scale, identifying five distinct archetype dimensions: "adventurer," "fellow traveler," "leader," "drifter" and "misfit." Study 1 identified five dimensions among White majority members (N = 307), four of which were related to extremist violent intentions and which dissociated in terms of sociopolitical ideologies and intergroup attitudes. Preregistered Study 2 (N = 308) confirmed the scale's five-factor solution in another sample of White majority members, replicated relationships with violent intentions, and demonstrated the dimensions' distinct personality correlates. As in Study 1, the archetype dimensions had positive associations with extremist violent intentions and tapped onto different psychological profiles in terms of major personality traits. Study 3 (N = 317) replicated these results in a sample of Muslim minority members. Measurement equivalence was established across gender, age, political orientation, and ethnicity (majority and minority).

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

References

    1. Victoroff J. (2005). The mind of the terrorist. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 49(1), 3–42. doi: 10.1177/0022002704272040 - DOI
    1. Horgan J., Shortland N., & Abbasciano S. (2018). Towards a typology of terrorism involvement: A behavioral differentiation of violent extremist offenders. Journal of Threat Assessment and Management, 5(2), 84–102. doi: 10.1037/tam0000102 - DOI
    1. Bjørgo T. (2016). Counter-terrorism as crime prevention: A holistic approach. Behavioral Sciences of Terrorism and Political Aggression, 8(1), 25–44. doi: 10.1080/19434472.2015.1108352 - DOI
    1. Nesser P. (2015). Islamist terrorism in Europe: A history. Oxford University Press.
    1. Jasko K., & LaFree G. (2019). Who is more violent in extremist groups? A comparison of leaders and followers. Aggressive Behavior, 46(2), 141–150. doi: 10.1002/ab.21865 - DOI - PubMed

Publication types