Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2022 Aug 2;119(31):e2204336119.
doi: 10.1073/pnas.2204336119. Epub 2022 Jul 15.

The durability of natural infection and vaccine-induced immunity against future infection by SARS-CoV-2

Affiliations
Comparative Study

The durability of natural infection and vaccine-induced immunity against future infection by SARS-CoV-2

Jeffrey P Townsend et al. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. .

Abstract

The durability of vaccine-mediated immunity to SARS-CoV-2, the durations to breakthrough infection, and the optimal timings of booster vaccination are crucial knowledge for pandemic response. Here, we applied comparative evolutionary analyses to estimate the durability of immunity and the likelihood of breakthrough infections over time following vaccination by BNT162b2 (Pfizer-BioNTech), mRNA-1273 (Moderna), ChAdOx1 (Oxford-AstraZeneca), and Ad26.COV2.S (Johnson & Johnson/Janssen). We evaluated anti-Spike (S) immunoglobulin G (IgG) antibody levels elicited by each vaccine relative to natural infection. We estimated typical trajectories of waning and corresponding infection probabilities, providing the distribution of times to breakthrough infection for each vaccine under endemic conditions. Peak antibody levels elicited by messenger RNA (mRNA) vaccines mRNA-1273 and BNT1262b2 exceeded that of natural infection and are expected to typically yield more durable protection against breakthrough infections (median 29.6 mo; 5 to 95% quantiles 10.9 mo to 7.9 y) than natural infection (median 21.5 mo; 5 to 95% quantiles 3.5 mo to 7.1 y). Relative to mRNA-1273 and BNT1262b2, viral vector vaccines ChAdOx1 and Ad26.COV2.S exhibit similar peak anti-S IgG antibody responses to that from natural infection and are projected to yield lower, shorter-term protection against breakthrough infection (median 22.4 mo and 5 to 95% quantiles 4.3 mo to 7.2 y; and median 20.5 mo and 5 to 95% quantiles 2.6 mo to 7.0 y; respectively). These results leverage the tools from evolutionary biology to provide a quantitative basis for otherwise unknown parameters that are fundamental to public health policy decision-making.

Keywords: COVID-19; SARS-CoV-2; antibody; immunity; vaccine.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no competing interest.

Figures

Fig. 1.
Fig. 1.
Peak-normalized anti-S1 IgG antibody levels; probabilities of no breakthrough infection given antibody level; and probabilities of natural reinfection or breakthrough infection for Ad26.COV2.S, ChAdOx1, BNT162b2, and mRNA-1273 vaccinations against SARS-CoV-2 infection over 4,000 d postpeak response. (A) Peak-normalized anti-S1 IgG antibody levels for vaccination with Ad26.COV2.S (blue), vaccination with ChAdOx1 (green), natural infection (navy, dashed), vaccination with BNT162b2 (yellow, dashed), and vaccination with mRNA-1273 (orange, dashed) against SARS-CoV-2 infection over 4,000 d postpeak response and (Inset) over the first 400 d (just over 1 y) postpeak response. (B) Probability of no natural reinfection or no breakthrough infection for Ad26.COV2.S, ChAdOx1, BNT162b2, and mRNA-1273 vaccinations against SARS-CoV-2 infection over 4,000 d postpeak response and (Inset) over the first 400 d postpeak response. (C) Probabilities of natural reinfection or breakthrough infection for Ad26.COV2.S, ChAdOx1, BNT162b2, and mRNA-1273 vaccinations against SARS-CoV-2 infection over 4,000 d postpeak response and (Inset) over the first 1,000 d postpeak response.
Fig. 2.
Fig. 2.
Mean time to 5% cumulative risk of natural reinfection or breakthrough infection under endemic conditions for mRNA-1273, BNT162b2, ChAdOx1, and Ad26.COV2.S vaccinations against SARS-CoV-2.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Polack F. P., et al. ; C4591001 Clinical Trial Group, Safety and efficacy of the BNT162b2 mRNA Covid-19 vaccine. N. Engl. J. Med. 383, 2603–2615 (2020). - PMC - PubMed
    1. Baden L. R., et al. ; COVE Study Group, Efficacy and safety of the mRNA-1273 SARS-CoV-2 vaccine. N. Engl. J. Med. 384, 403–416 (2021). - PMC - PubMed
    1. Sadoff J., et al. ; ENSEMBLE Study Group, Safety and efficacy of single-dose Ad26.COV2.S vaccine against Covid-19. N. Engl. J. Med. 384, 2187–2201 (2021). - PMC - PubMed
    1. Voysey M., et al. ; Oxford COVID Vaccine Trial Group, Safety and efficacy of the ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 vaccine (AZD1222) against SARS-CoV-2: An interim analysis of four randomised controlled trials in Brazil, South Africa, and the UK. Lancet 397, 99–111 (2021). - PMC - PubMed
    1. Feikin D., et al. , Duration of effectiveness of vaccines against SARS-CoV-2 infection and COVID-19 disease: Results of a systematic review and meta-regression. Lancet 399, 924–944 (2022). - PMC - PubMed

Publication types