Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2022 Jan;155(1):11-21.
doi: 10.4103/ijmr.IJMR_808_18.

Urinary immunoglobulins in viral diagnosis: An overview

Affiliations
Review

Urinary immunoglobulins in viral diagnosis: An overview

Sreelekshmy Mohandas et al. Indian J Med Res. 2022 Jan.

Erratum in

Abstract

Antibody detection by serological methods gained a lot of interest in recent years and has become the backbone of virological diagnosis. Despite the detection of all five classes of immunoglobulins in urine, not much attention has been paid to the use of urine as a diagnostic sample to detect viral antibodies. Unlike venipuncture, this non-invasive mode of sample collection can help cover all age groups, especially paediatric and old age patients, where blood collection is difficult. Using urine as a sample is also economical and involves lesser risk in sample collection. The antibodies are found to be stable in urine at room temperature for a prolonged period, which makes the sample transport management easier as well. A few recent studies, have also shown that the detection limit of antibodies in urine is at par with serum or other clinical material. So, the ease in sample collection, availability of samples in large quantity and stability of immunoglobulins in urine for prolonged periods can make urine an ideal sample for viral diagnosis.

Keywords: Antibody detection; diagnostics; immunoglobulins; urine; viral diseases.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflicts of Interest: None.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Clarke DH, Casals J. Techniques for hemagglutination and hemagglutination-inhibition with arthropod-borne viruses. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 1958;7:561–73. - PubMed
    1. Souf S. Recent advances in diagnostic testing for viral infections. Biosci Horiz. 2016;9:1–11.
    1. Ksiazek TG, West CP, Rollin PE, Jahrling PB, Peters CJ. ELISA for the detection of antibodies to Ebola viruses. J Infect Dis. 1999;179:192–8. - PubMed
    1. Kim SK, Hwang SH, Oh HB. Serological tests for the diagnosis of infectious diseases. BioChip J. 2016;10:346–53.
    1. Andries AC, Duong V, Ong S, Ros S, Sakuntabhai A, Horwood P, et al. Evaluation of the performances of six commercial kits designed for dengue NS1 and anti-dengue IgM, IgG and IgA detection in urine and saliva clinical specimens. BMC Infect Dis. 2016;16:201. - PMC - PubMed

Substances