Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 May 25:79:103848.
doi: 10.1016/j.amsu.2022.103848. eCollection 2022 Jul.

Biofeedback therapy for anorectal functional disorder: Malaysian colorectal tertiary centre experience

Affiliations

Biofeedback therapy for anorectal functional disorder: Malaysian colorectal tertiary centre experience

Saidah Sahid et al. Ann Med Surg (Lond). .

Abstract

Background: Anorectal functional disorder encompasses arrays of conditions including Obstructive Defecation Syndrome (ODS) and Fecal Incontinence (FI). Biofeedback Therapy (BFT) serves as first line therapy to re-train pelvic floor coordination, rectal sensation and strengthening pelvic floor muscle. The aim of this study is determining the efficacy of BFT in our centre.

Methods: This is a retrospective observational cohort study of patients attended biofeedback therapy session from January 2013 to December 2018. Descriptive statistic was used to analyse the data.

Result: Total 99 patients with mean age of 44.6 ± 18.1 with female 56% (n = 55) and male 44% (n = 44) attended BFT session. Overall, 77 had CC (77%) and 23 (23%) had FI. Mean number of sessions was 11.8. Overall improvement rate 42 (42%), no improvement 32 (32%) and defaulted 26 (26%). In patients with CC, 32 (41.6%) had improvement in symptoms, 23 (29.9%) had no improvements, 22 (28.6%) defaulted BFT.Patients with FI, 7 (30.4%) had Obstetric Sphincter Injury, 7 (30.4%) had traumatic anal injury, 3 (13.0%) has Low Anterior Resection Syndrome, 2 (8.7%) had sphincter injury following anal sepsis, 2 (13.0%) had rectocele repair and 1 (4.3%) were idiopathic. 9 patients (39.1%) had stoma created. Overall response rate was: 10 patients (43.5%) had improvement in symptoms, 9 patients (39.1%) had no improvement, 4 patients (17.4%) defaulted therapy.

Conclusion: Our outcome rate is lower compared to published due the limited access and logistic restrictions. This issue should be given great consideration such as broadening the service and training.

Keywords: Biofeedback, therapy; anorectal, functional disorder.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

All authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

References

    1. Rao S.S.C., Bharucha A.E., Chiarioni G., et al. Anorectal disorders. Gastroenterology. 2016;150(6):1430–1442. e4. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Kim S., Harvey M.A., Johnston S. A review of the epidemiology and pathophysiology of pelvic floor dysfunction: do racial differences matter? J. Obstet. Gynaecol. Can. 2005;27(3):251–259. - PubMed
    1. Rao S.S.C., Seaton K., Miller M.J., et al. Psychological profiles and quality of life differ between patients with dyssynergia and those with slow transit constipation. J. Psychosom. Res. 2007;63(4):441–449. - PubMed
    1. Carrington E.v., Heinrich H., Knowles C.H., et al. The international anorectal physiology working group (IAPWG) recommendations: standardized testing protocol and the London classification for disorders of anorectal function. Neuro Gastroenterol. Motil. 2020;32(1) - PMC - PubMed
    1. Rao S.S.C., Seaton K., Miller M., et al. Randomized controlled trial of biofeedback, sham feedback, and standard therapy for dyssynergic defecation. Clin. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 2007;5(3):331–338. - PubMed