Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Jun 28;49(12):e2022GL099114.
doi: 10.1029/2022GL099114. Epub 2022 Jun 16.

Influence of Magnetic Fields on Precipitating Solar Wind Hydrogen at Mars

Affiliations

Influence of Magnetic Fields on Precipitating Solar Wind Hydrogen at Mars

Sarah Henderson et al. Geophys Res Lett. .

Abstract

Solar wind protons can interact directly with the hydrogen corona of Mars through charge exchange, resulting in energetic neutral atoms (ENAs) able to penetrate deep into the upper atmosphere of Mars. ENAs can undergo multiple charge changing interactions, leading to an observable beam of penetrating protons in the upper atmosphere. We seek to characterize the behavior of these protons in the presence of magnetic fields using data collected by the Mars Atmosphere and Volatile EvolutioN spacecraft. We find that backscattered penetrating proton flux is enhanced in regions where the magnetic field strength is greater than 200 nT. We also find a strong correlation at CO2 column densities less than 5.5 × 1014 cm-2 between magnetic field strength and the observed backscattered and downward flux. We do not see significant changes in penetrating proton flux with magnetic field strengths on the order of 10 nT.

Keywords: MAVEN; penetrating protons; solar wind hydrogen.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
(a) Example differential energy flux Solar Wind Ion Analyzer (SWIA) spectrum collected at periapsis on 6 November 2016. Characteristic penetrating proton signature can be seen between 10:01 and 10:17 a.m. (b) Example of angular‐averaged profile of downward‐propagating protons. Pink points represent background‐corrected, angle‐averaged flux. Gray points correspond to points that fall between 0.25 and 1.75 E peak. Blue points are a result of quadratic spline interpolation. Gaussian fit overplotted in black, which is used to find characteristic heights and full widths at half maximum (FWHMs) for each profile (c) Corresponding backscattered proton profile for timestamp in (b) (note different scale).
Figure 2
Figure 2
(a) Median, normalized downward penetrating proton flux as a function of magnetic field strength and elevation angle. (b) Median, normalized backscattered proton flux. (c) Ratio of median normalized backscattered and downward proton flux. (d) Total number of data points per bin.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Behavior of downward and backscattered penetrating proton flux as a function of magnetic field strength for different column density ranges. The column density (altitude) increases (decreases) from Panels a to i. Slopes (m) and their standard errors (SEs) are displayed to the right of Panels c, f, and i. (a) Median normalized downward and backscattered penetrating proton flux with Q1 and Q3 displayed as lower and upper error bars, respectively, in 10 nT bins. These statistical quantities were chosen due to a nonnormal distribution of penetrating proton fluxes. Data were collected at column densities 1013–5.5 × 1013 cm−2. Panels d and g follow this format and are collected at column densities indicated in titles. (b) Ratio of median backscattered and downward fluxes for data collected at column densities 1013–5.5 × 1013 cm−2. Error bars displayed are Q1 and Q3 computed over 10 nT bins. Panels e and h follow this format and are collected at column densities indicated in titles. (c) Distribution of backscattered and downward data at column densities 5.5 × 1013–1014 cm−2. Panels f and i follow this format and are collected at column densities indicated in titles.

References

    1. Acuña, M. H. , Connerney, J. E. P. , Wasilewski, P. , Lin, R. P. , Anderson, K. A. , Carlson, C. W. , et al. (1998). Magnetic field and plasma observations at Mars: Initial results of Mars Global Surveyor mission. Science, 279, 1676–1680. 10.1126/science.279.5357.167 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Anderson, D. E., Jr. (1974). Mariner 6, 7, and 9 ultraviolet spectrometer experiment: Analysis of hydrogen Lyman alpha data. Journal of Geophysical Research, 79, 1513–1518. 10.1029/JA079i010p01513 - DOI
    1. Anderson, D. E., Jr. , & Hord, C. W. (1971). Mariner 6, 7, and 9 ultraviolet spectrometer experiment: Analysis of hydrogen Lyman alpha data. Journal of Geophysical Research, 76, 6666–6673. 10.1029/JA076i028p06666 - DOI
    1. Bisikalo, D. V. , Shematovich, V. I. , Gérard, J.‐C. , & Hubert, B. (2018). Monte Carlo simulations of the interaction of fast proton and hydrogen atoms with Martian atmosphere and comparison with in situ measurements. Journal of Geophysical Research: Space Physics, 123, 5850–5861. 10.1029/2018JA025400 - DOI
    1. Brain, D. , Mitchell, D. , & Halekas, J. S. (2006). The magnetic field draping direction at Mars from April 1999 through August 2004. Icarus, 182(2), 464–473. 10.1016/j.icarus.2005.09.023 - DOI

LinkOut - more resources