How do general practitioners test and treat gonococcal infections in the Australian Capital Territory? Implications for disease surveillance and control
- PMID: 35860869
- DOI: 10.33321/cdi.2022.46.45
How do general practitioners test and treat gonococcal infections in the Australian Capital Territory? Implications for disease surveillance and control
Abstract
The incidence of Neisseria gonorrhoeae (gonorrhoea) and Treponema pallidum (syphilis) infections in the Australian Capital Territory (ACT) has increased since 2014 in people reporting heterosexual exposure. This population is more likely to present to general practice rather than to specialised sexual health clinics, with potential implications for disease surveillance and control. This study aimed to explore: conformity of self-reported clinical practice with sexually transmitted infection guidelines in general practice; gaps in sexual health knowledge and skills; and areas for improved support from ACT Health Communicable Disease Control. A cross-sectional survey of general practitioners (GPs) and nurse practitioners (NPs) practicing in the ACT was conducted in December 2020, using a 17-item questionnaire and semi-structured interviews. Twenty-three GPs and one NP returned completed surveys (response rate 5.3%); four GPs and one NP participated in interviews. In its complex setting of competing demands, GP practice may not always meet national guidelines. In response to clinical vignettes, although all GPs ordered investigations for gonorrhoea, only 25% of these met the gold-standard by including endocervical or vaginal swabs. With respect to assessing antimicrobial sensitivities to guide treatment, only 58% correctly reported following up a positive gonococcal polymerase chain reaction test with a culture. Around two-thirds of respondents (62.5%) identified the appropriate antibiotic therapy and 75% correctly identified the responsibility of the diagnosing clinician to discuss contact tracing with the patient. Suggestions for increased support focussed on education, communication efficiency, and providing a 'safety net' for follow up.
Keywords: Sexually transmitted infections; antimicrobial resistance surveillance; general practice; gonorrhoea; primary care; syphilis.
© Commonwealth of Australia CC BY-NC-ND.
Similar articles
-
Australian Gonococcal Surveillance Programme Annual Report, 2018.Commun Dis Intell (2018). 2020 Feb 17;44. doi: 10.33321/cdi.2020.44.4. Commun Dis Intell (2018). 2020. PMID: 32114974
-
Trends in antimicrobial management of gonorrhoea by general practitioners in Amsterdam, the Netherlands, between 2010 and 2016: a cross-sectional study.BMC Fam Pract. 2019 Jan 15;20(1):12. doi: 10.1186/s12875-018-0900-9. BMC Fam Pract. 2019. PMID: 30646849 Free PMC article.
-
Neisseria gonorrhoeae Antimicrobial Susceptibility Surveillance - The Gonococcal Isolate Surveillance Project, 27 Sites, United States, 2014.MMWR Surveill Summ. 2016 Jul 15;65(7):1-19. doi: 10.15585/mmwr.ss6507a1. MMWR Surveill Summ. 2016. PMID: 27414503
-
Issues in the management of sexually transmitted diseases in Papua New Guinea.P N G Med J. 1996 Sep;39(3):252-60. P N G Med J. 1996. PMID: 9795576 Review.
-
Frequency and correlates of culture-positive infection with Neisseria gonorrhoeae in England: a review of sentinel surveillance data.Sex Transm Infect. 2015 Jun;91(4):287-93. doi: 10.1136/sextrans-2014-051756. Epub 2014 Oct 28. Sex Transm Infect. 2015. PMID: 25352692 Review.
Cited by
-
Policy, practice, and prediction: model-based approaches to evaluating N. gonorrhoeae antibiotic susceptibility test uptake in Australia.BMC Infect Dis. 2024 May 17;24(1):498. doi: 10.1186/s12879-024-09393-y. BMC Infect Dis. 2024. PMID: 38760682 Free PMC article.
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Medical
Miscellaneous