Roe v Wade and the Threat to Fertility Care
- PMID: 35861359
- DOI: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000004928
Roe v Wade and the Threat to Fertility Care
Abstract
On June 24, 2022, the U.S. Supreme Court ruling in Dobbs v Jackson Women's Health overturned Roe v Wade , and authority to regulate abortion was returned to individual states. It is critically important for all physicians to understand the implications that this ruling may have on reproductive autonomy with regard to abortion care and in vitro fertilization (IVF). Although the intended consequence of abortion bans is to prohibit legal abortion, one unintended consequence may be undue restriction of in vitro fertilization. We summarize the potential of abortion bans, particularly those with personhood clauses, to affect IVF practice. We detail the implications of these bans on embryo cryopreservation, preimplantation genetic testing, single embryo transfer, and access to infertility treatments. In the United States in 2019, nearly 84,000 children were born as a result of IVF (2.2% of all births), and nearly 250,000 IVF cycles were performed. These bans will have a profound effect beyond abortion, and these implications are not widely understood in the medical community.
Copyright © 2022 by the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.
Conflict of interest statement
Financial Disclosure The authors did not report any potential conflicts of interest.
Similar articles
-
Post-Roe v Wade psychiatry: legal, clinical, and ethical challenges in psychiatry under abortion bans.Lancet Psychiatry. 2024 Oct;11(10):853-862. doi: 10.1016/S2215-0366(24)00096-8. Epub 2024 May 22. Lancet Psychiatry. 2024. PMID: 38795722 Review.
-
Trends in Abortion- and Contraception-Related Internet Searches After the US Supreme Court Overturned Constitutional Abortion Rights: How Much Do State Laws Matter?JAMA Health Forum. 2023 Apr 7;4(4):e230518. doi: 10.1001/jamahealthforum.2023.0518. JAMA Health Forum. 2023. PMID: 37115538 Free PMC article.
-
INTRODUCTION: Securing Reproductive Justice After Dobbs.J Law Med Ethics. 2023;51(3):463-467. doi: 10.1017/jme.2023.88. Epub 2023 Dec 13. J Law Med Ethics. 2023. PMID: 38088627
-
Potential Effects of Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health on Civil Commitment Law.Am J Law Med. 2023 Jul;49(2-3):359-373. doi: 10.1017/amj.2023.37. Epub 2024 Feb 12. Am J Law Med. 2023. PMID: 38344784
-
The impact of the Dobbs decision on in-vitro fertilization and fertility care.Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol. 2023 Aug 1;35(4):306-310. doi: 10.1097/GCO.0000000000000888. Epub 2023 May 23. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol. 2023. PMID: 37266567 Review.
Cited by
-
Projecting the long-term effects of the COVID-19 pandemic on U.S. population structure.Nat Commun. 2024 Mar 18;15(1):2409. doi: 10.1038/s41467-024-46582-4. Nat Commun. 2024. PMID: 38499539 Free PMC article.
-
Attitudes, concerns, and perceptions of patients undergoing fertility treatments in an abortion restrictive state in the aftermath of the Roe v. Wade reversal.J Assist Reprod Genet. 2024 Jul;41(7):1703-1711. doi: 10.1007/s10815-024-03145-2. Epub 2024 Jun 8. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2024. PMID: 38850329 Free PMC article.
-
Expecting more: the case for incorporating fertility services into comprehensive sickle cell disease care.Lancet Haematol. 2023 Mar;10(3):e225-e234. doi: 10.1016/S2352-3026(22)00353-2. Epub 2023 Jan 25. Lancet Haematol. 2023. PMID: 36708736 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Parent and pediatric nurse practitioner views on integrating the digital TELL tool intervention into clinical practice.J Pediatr Nurs. 2025 Mar-Apr;81:e134-e142. doi: 10.1016/j.pedn.2025.02.009. Epub 2025 Feb 26. J Pediatr Nurs. 2025. PMID: 40016012 Clinical Trial.
-
Preimplantation sex selection via in vitro fertilization: time for a reappraisal.F S Rep. 2023 May 26;4(3):241-243. doi: 10.1016/j.xfre.2023.05.006. eCollection 2023 Sep. F S Rep. 2023. PMID: 37719093 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Hamilton BE, Martin JA, Osterman MJK. Births: provisional data for 2019. Vital Statistics Rapid Release; no 8. National Center for Health Statistics; 2020.
-
- Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. 2019 assisted reproductive technology fertility clinic and national summary report. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services; 2021.
-
- ASRM Center for Policy and Leadership. State abortion trigger laws: potential implications for reproductive medicine. Accessed July 11, 2022. https://www.asrm.org/globalassets/asrm/asrm-content/news-and-publication...
-
- Hairston JC, Kohlmeier A, Feinberg EC. Compassionate embryo transfer: physician practices and perspectives. Fertil Sterility 2020;114:552–7. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2020.04.026 - DOI
-
- Walsh AP, Tsar OM, Walsh DJ, Baldwin PM, Shkrobot LV, Sills ES. Who abandons embryos after IVF? Ir Med J 2010;103:107–10
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical