Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Oct 1;140(4):557-559.
doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000004928. Epub 2022 Jul 20.

Roe v Wade and the Threat to Fertility Care

Affiliations

Roe v Wade and the Threat to Fertility Care

Eve C Feinberg et al. Obstet Gynecol. .

Abstract

On June 24, 2022, the U.S. Supreme Court ruling in Dobbs v Jackson Women's Health overturned Roe v Wade , and authority to regulate abortion was returned to individual states. It is critically important for all physicians to understand the implications that this ruling may have on reproductive autonomy with regard to abortion care and in vitro fertilization (IVF). Although the intended consequence of abortion bans is to prohibit legal abortion, one unintended consequence may be undue restriction of in vitro fertilization. We summarize the potential of abortion bans, particularly those with personhood clauses, to affect IVF practice. We detail the implications of these bans on embryo cryopreservation, preimplantation genetic testing, single embryo transfer, and access to infertility treatments. In the United States in 2019, nearly 84,000 children were born as a result of IVF (2.2% of all births), and nearly 250,000 IVF cycles were performed. These bans will have a profound effect beyond abortion, and these implications are not widely understood in the medical community.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Financial Disclosure The authors did not report any potential conflicts of interest.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Hamilton BE, Martin JA, Osterman MJK. Births: provisional data for 2019. Vital Statistics Rapid Release; no 8. National Center for Health Statistics; 2020.
    1. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. 2019 assisted reproductive technology fertility clinic and national summary report. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services; 2021.
    1. ASRM Center for Policy and Leadership. State abortion trigger laws: potential implications for reproductive medicine. Accessed July 11, 2022. https://www.asrm.org/globalassets/asrm/asrm-content/news-and-publication...
    1. Hairston JC, Kohlmeier A, Feinberg EC. Compassionate embryo transfer: physician practices and perspectives. Fertil Sterility 2020;114:552–7. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2020.04.026 - DOI
    1. Walsh AP, Tsar OM, Walsh DJ, Baldwin PM, Shkrobot LV, Sills ES. Who abandons embryos after IVF? Ir Med J 2010;103:107–10