Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Aug;37(8):1875-1884.
doi: 10.1007/s00384-022-04210-x. Epub 2022 Jul 21.

Computer-aided diagnosis of serrated colorectal lesions using non-magnified white-light endoscopic images

Affiliations

Computer-aided diagnosis of serrated colorectal lesions using non-magnified white-light endoscopic images

Daiki Nemoto et al. Int J Colorectal Dis. 2022 Aug.

Abstract

Purpose: Computer-aided diagnosis systems for polyp characterization are commercially available but cannot recognize subtypes of sessile lesions. This study aimed to develop a computer-aided diagnosis system to characterize polyps using non-magnified white-light endoscopic images.

Methods: A total of 2249 non-magnified white-light images from 1030 lesions including 534 tubular adenomas, 225 sessile serrated adenoma/polyps, and 271 hyperplastic polyps in the proximal colon were consecutively extracted from an image library and divided into training and testing datasets (4:1), based on the date of colonoscopy. Using ResNet-50 networks, we developed a classifier (1) to differentiate adenomas from serrated lesions, and another classifier (2) to differentiate sessile serrated adenoma/polyps from hyperplastic polyps. Diagnostic performance was assessed using the testing dataset. The computer-aided diagnosis system generated a probability score for each image, and a probability score for each lesion was calculated as the weighted mean with a log10-transformation. Two experts (E1, E2) read the identical testing dataset with a probability score.

Results: The area under the curve of classifier (1) for adenomas was equivalent to E1 and superior to E2 (classifier 86%, E1 86%, E2 69%; classifier vs. E2, p < 0.001). In contrast, the area under the curve of classifier (2) for sessile serrated adenoma/polyps was inferior to both experts (classifier 55%, E1 68%, E2 79%; classifier vs. E2, p < 0.001).

Conclusion: The classifier (1) developed using white-light images alone compares favorably with experts in differentiating adenomas from serrated lesions. However, the classifier (2) to identify sessile serrated adenoma/polyps is inferior to experts.

Keywords: Artificial intelligence; Colonic polyps; Colonoscopy; Serrated lesion.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Bettington M, Walker N, Clouston A et al (2013) The serrated pathway to colorectal carcinoma: current concepts and challenges. Histopathology 62:367–386. https://doi.org/10.1111/his.12055 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Rosty C, Hewett DG, Brown IS et al (2013) Serrated polyps of the large intestine: current understanding of diagnosis, pathogenesis, and clinical management. J Gastroenterol 48:287–302. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00535-012-0720-y - DOI - PubMed
    1. Pai RK, Mäkinen MJ, Rosty C (2019) Colorectal serrated lesions and polyps. In: WHO Classification of Tumours Editorial Board (ed). Digestive system tumours. IARC: Lyon, France, pp 163–70
    1. Snover DC, Ahnen DJ, Burt RW et al (2010) Serrated polyps of the colon and rectum and serrated polyposis. In: Bosman FT, Carneiro F, Hruban RH, Theise ND, editors.WHO classification of tumours of the digestive system. IARC: Lyon, France, pp 160–165
    1. Kashida H (2019) Endoscopic diagnosis of sessile serrated polyp: A systematic review. Dig Endosc 31:16–23. https://doi.org/10.1111/den.13263 - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources