Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Jul 21;11(7):e37729.
doi: 10.2196/37729.

Digital Technologies for Health Promotion and Disease Prevention in Older People: Protocol for a Scoping Review

Affiliations

Digital Technologies for Health Promotion and Disease Prevention in Older People: Protocol for a Scoping Review

Karina Karolina De Santis et al. JMIR Res Protoc. .

Abstract

Background: Digital technologies could contribute to health promotion and disease prevention. It is unclear if and how such digital technologies address the health needs of older people in nonclinical settings (ie, daily life).

Objective: This study aims to identify digital technologies for health promotion and disease prevention that target the needs of older people in nonclinical settings by performing a scoping review of the published literature. The scoping review is guided by the framework of Arksey and O'Malley.

Methods: Our scoping review follows the PRISMA-ScR (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses Extension for Scoping Reviews) guidelines. The information sources are bibliographic databases (MEDLINE, PsycINFO, CINAHL, and SCOPUS) and bibliographies of any included systematic reviews. Manual searches for additional studies will be performed in Google Scholar and most relevant journals. The electronic search strategy was developed in collaboration with a librarian who performed the search for studies on digital technologies for health promotion and disease prevention targeting the needs of older people. Study selection and data coding will be performed independently by 2 authors. Consensus will be reached by discussion. Eligibility is based on the PCC (Population, Concept, and Context) criteria as follows: (1) older people (population); (2) any digital (health) technology, such as websites, smartphone apps, or wearables (concept); and (3) health promotion and disease prevention in nonclinical (daily life, home, or community) settings (context). Primary studies with any design or reviews with a systematic methodology published in peer-reviewed academic journals will be included. Data items will address study designs, PCC criteria, benefits or barriers related to digital technology use by older people, and evidence gaps. Data will be synthesized using descriptive statistics or narratively described by identifying common themes. Quality appraisal will be performed for any included systematic reviews, using a validated instrument for this study type (A Measurement Tool to Assess Systematic Reviews, version 2 [AMSTAR2]).

Results: Following preliminary literature searches to test and calibrate the search syntax, the electronic literature search was performed in March 2022 and manual searches were completed in June 2022. Study selection based on titles and abstracts was completed in July 2022, and the full-text screen was initiated in July 2022.

Conclusions: Our scoping review will identify the types of digital technologies, health targets in the context of health promotion and disease prevention, and health benefits or barriers associated with the use of such technologies for older people in nonclinical settings. This knowledge could guide further research on how digital technologies can support healthy aging.

International registered report identifier (irrid): PRR1-10.2196/37729.

Keywords: digital public health; digital technology; disease prevention; elderly population; health promotion; health technology; healthy aging; older adult; older population; scoping review.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflicts of Interest: None declared.

References

    1. Zeeb H, Pigeot I, Schüz B, Leibniz-WissenschaftsCampus Digital Public Health Bremen [Digital public health-an overview] Bundesgesundheitsblatt Gesundheitsforschung Gesundheitsschutz. 2020 Feb 09;63(2):137–144. doi: 10.1007/s00103-019-03078-7.10.1007/s00103-019-03078-7 - DOI - PubMed
    1. De Santis KK, Jahnel T, Sina E, Wienert J, Zeeb H. Digitization and health in Germany: Cross-sectional nationwide survey. JMIR Public Health Surveill. 2021 Nov 22;7(11):e32951. doi: 10.2196/32951. https://publichealth.jmir.org/2021/11/e32951/ v7i11e32951 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Ienca M, Schneble C, Kressig RW, Wangmo T. Digital health interventions for healthy ageing: a qualitative user evaluation and ethical assessment. BMC Geriatr. 2021 Jul 02;21(1):412. doi: 10.1186/s12877-021-02338-z. https://bmcgeriatr.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12877-021-02338-z 10.1186/s12877-021-02338-z - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Pywell J, Vijaykumar S, Dodd A, Coventry L. Barriers to older adults' uptake of mobile-based mental health interventions. Digit Health. 2020;6:2055207620905422. doi: 10.1177/2055207620905422. https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/2055207620905422?url_ver=Z39.88... 10.1177_2055207620905422 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Wilson J, Heinsch M, Betts D, Booth D, Kay-Lambkin F. Barriers and facilitators to the use of e-health by older adults: a scoping review. BMC Public Health. 2021 Aug 17;21(1):1556. doi: 10.1186/s12889-021-11623-w. https://bmcpublichealth.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12889-021-11... 10.1186/s12889-021-11623-w - DOI - PMC - PubMed