Artificial intelligence in medical education curriculum: An e-Delphi study for competencies
- PMID: 35862401
- PMCID: PMC9302857
- DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0271872
Artificial intelligence in medical education curriculum: An e-Delphi study for competencies
Abstract
Background: Artificial intelligence (AI) has affected our day-to-day in a great extent. Healthcare industry is one of the mainstream fields among those and produced a noticeable change in treatment and education. Medical students must comprehend well why AI technologies mediate and frame their decisions on medical issues. Formalizing of instruction on AI concepts can facilitate learners to grasp AI outcomes in association with their sensory perceptions and thinking in the dynamic and ambiguous reality of daily medical practice. The purpose of this study is to provide consensus on the competencies required by medical graduates to be ready for artificial intelligence technologies and possible applications in medicine and reporting the results.
Materials and methods: A three-round e-Delphi survey was conducted between February 2020 and November 2020. The Delphi panel accorporated experts from different backgrounds; (i) healthcare professionals/ academicians; (ii) computer and data science professionals/ academics; (iii) law and ethics professionals/ academics; and (iv) medical students. Round 1 in the Delphi survey began with exploratory open-ended questions. Responses received in the first round evaluated and refined to a 27-item questionnaire which then sent to the experts to be rated using a 7-point Likert type scale (1: Strongly Disagree-7: Strongly Agree). Similar to the second round, the participants repeated their assessments in the third round by using the second-round analysis. The agreement level and strength of the consensus was decided based on third phase results. Median scores was used to calculate the agreement level and the interquartile range (IQR) was used for determining the strength of the consensus.
Results: Among 128 invitees, a total of 94 agreed to become members of the expert panel. Of them 75 (79.8%) completed the Round 1 questionnaire, 69/75 (92.0%) completed the Round 2 and 60/69 (87.0%) responded to the Round 3. There was a strong agreement on the 23 items and weak agreement on the 4 items.
Conclusions: This study has provided a consensus list of the competencies required by the medical graduates to be ready for AI implications that would bring new perspectives to medical education curricula. The unique feature of the current research is providing a guiding role in integrating AI into curriculum processes, syllabus content and training of medical students.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
Figures
Similar articles
-
Defining Medical AI Competencies for Medical School Graduates: Outcomes of a Delphi Survey and Medical Student/Educator Questionnaire of South Korean Medical Schools.Acad Med. 2024 May 1;99(5):524-533. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000005618. Epub 2023 Dec 28. Acad Med. 2024. PMID: 38207056
-
Ethical implications of AI in robotic surgical training: A Delphi consensus statement.Eur Urol Focus. 2022 Mar;8(2):613-622. doi: 10.1016/j.euf.2021.04.006. Epub 2021 Apr 30. Eur Urol Focus. 2022. PMID: 33941503 Review.
-
Development of a virtual classroom for pre-analytical phase of laboratory medicine for undergraduate medical students using the Delphi technique.PLoS One. 2022 Apr 6;17(4):e0264447. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0264447. eCollection 2022. PLoS One. 2022. PMID: 35385486 Free PMC article.
-
Consensus views on competencies and teaching methods for an interprofessional curriculum on complementary and integrative medicine: A Delphi study.J Integr Med. 2021 May;19(3):282-290. doi: 10.1016/j.joim.2021.03.001. Epub 2021 Mar 6. J Integr Med. 2021. PMID: 33745897
-
Consensus on global health competencies for Korean medical students using a modified Delphi method.Korean J Med Educ. 2023 Dec;35(4):389-405. doi: 10.3946/kjme.2023.275. Epub 2023 Dec 1. Korean J Med Educ. 2023. PMID: 38062685 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
Quantum leap in medical mentorship: exploring ChatGPT's transition from textbooks to terabytes.Front Med (Lausanne). 2025 Apr 28;12:1517981. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2025.1517981. eCollection 2025. Front Med (Lausanne). 2025. PMID: 40375935 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Development of a basic evaluation model for manual therapy learning in rehabilitation students based on the Delphi method.BMC Med Educ. 2024 Sep 4;24(1):964. doi: 10.1186/s12909-024-05932-y. BMC Med Educ. 2024. PMID: 39232741 Free PMC article.
-
Artificial Intelligence in Orthopedic Radiography Analysis: A Narrative Review.Diagnostics (Basel). 2022 Sep 16;12(9):2235. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics12092235. Diagnostics (Basel). 2022. PMID: 36140636 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Shaping the future: perspectives on the Integration of Artificial Intelligence in health profession education: a multi-country survey.BMC Med Educ. 2024 Oct 18;24(1):1166. doi: 10.1186/s12909-024-06076-9. BMC Med Educ. 2024. PMID: 39425151 Free PMC article.
-
Proposing core competencies for physicians in using artificial intelligence tools in clinical practice.Intern Med J. 2025 Aug;55(8):1403-1409. doi: 10.1111/imj.70112. Epub 2025 Jun 27. Intern Med J. 2025. PMID: 40576330 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Srivastava TK, Waghmare L. Implications of Artificial Intelligence (AI) on Dynamics of Medical Education and Care: A Perspective. J Clin Diagnostic Res. 2020;:2019–20.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources