Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Jul 21;17(7):e0271662.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0271662. eCollection 2022.

Insights on the differentiation of stillbirths and early neonatal deaths: A study from the Child Health and Mortality Prevention Surveillance (CHAMPS) network

Affiliations

Insights on the differentiation of stillbirths and early neonatal deaths: A study from the Child Health and Mortality Prevention Surveillance (CHAMPS) network

Elizabeth Quincer et al. PLoS One. .

Abstract

Introduction: The high burden of stillbirths and neonatal deaths is driving global initiatives to improve birth outcomes. Discerning stillbirths from neonatal deaths can be difficult in some settings, yet this distinction is critical for understanding causes of perinatal deaths and improving resuscitation practices for live born babies.

Methods: We evaluated data from the Child Health and Mortality Prevention Surveillance (CHAMPS) network to compare the accuracy of determining stillbirths versus neonatal deaths from different data sources and to evaluate evidence of resuscitation at delivery in accordance with World Health Organization (WHO) guidelines. CHAMPS works to identify causes of stillbirth and death in children <5 years of age in Bangladesh and 6 countries in sub-Saharan Africa. Using CHAMPS data, we compared the final classification of a case as a stillbirth or neonatal death as certified by the CHAMPS Determining Cause of Death (DeCoDe) panel to both the initial report of the case by the family member or healthcare worker at CHAMPS enrollment and the birth outcome as stillbirth or livebirth documented in the maternal health record.

Results: Of 1967 deaths ultimately classified as stillbirth, only 28 (1.4%) were initially reported as livebirths. Of 845 cases classified as very early neonatal death, 33 (4%) were initially reported as stillbirth. Of 367 cases with post-mortem examination showing delivery weight >1000g and no maceration, the maternal clinical record documented that resuscitation was not performed in 161 cases (44%), performed in 14 (3%), and unknown or data missing for 192 (52%).

Conclusion: This analysis found that CHAMPS cases assigned as stillbirth or neonatal death after DeCoDe expert panel review were generally consistent with the initial report of the case as a stillbirth or neonatal death. Our findings suggest that more frequent use of resuscitation at delivery and improvements in documentation around events at birth could help improve perinatal outcomes.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Figures

Fig 1
Fig 1. Availability and indication of signs of life from clinical health record abstractions and the verbal autopsy for stillbirths and very early neonatal deaths at facilities in the Child Health and Mortality Prevention Surveillance (CHAMPS) network.
a. Stillbirths delivered in a facility (N = 1753). b. Very early neonatal deaths at a facility (N = 692).

Similar articles

Cited by

  • Prioritizing Health Care Strategies to Reduce Childhood Mortality.
    Madewell ZJ, Whitney CG, Velaphi S, Mutevedzi P, Mahtab S, Madhi SA, Fritz A, Swaray-Deen A, Sesay T, Ogbuanu IU, Mannah MT, Xerinda EG, Sitoe A, Mandomando I, Bassat Q, Ajanovic S, Tapia MD, Sow SO, Mehta A, Kotloff KL, Keita AM, Tippett Barr BA, Onyango D, Oele E, Igunza KA, Agaya J, Akelo V, Scott JAG, Madrid L, Kelil YE, Dufera T, Assefa N, Gurley ES, El Arifeen S, Spotts Whitney EA, Seib K, Rees CA, Blau DM; Child Health and Mortality Prevention Surveillance Network. Madewell ZJ, et al. JAMA Netw Open. 2022 Oct 3;5(10):e2237689. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.37689. JAMA Netw Open. 2022. PMID: 36269354 Free PMC article.

References

    1. United Nations Inter-agency Group for Child Mortality Estimation (UNIGME). Levels & Trends in Child Mortality: Report 2020, Estimates developed by the United Nations Inter-agency Group for Child Mortality Estimation. United Nations Children’s Fund: New York; 2020.
    1. Farag TH, Koplan JP, Breiman RF, et al.. Precisely Tracking Childhood Death. Am J Trop Med Hyg. Jul 2017;97(1):3–5. doi: 10.4269/ajtmh.16-0302 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Fraser J, Sidebotham P, Frederick J, Covington T, Mitchell EA. Learning from child death review in the USA, England, Australia, and New Zealand. Lancet (London, England). Sep 6 2014;384(9946):894–903. - PubMed
    1. Lau H, Litman KC. Saving lives by studying deaths: using standardized mortality reviews to improve inpatient safety. Joint Commission journal on quality and patient safety. Sep 2011;37(9):400–408. doi: 10.1016/s1553-7250(11)37050-x - DOI - PubMed
    1. Jha P. Reliable direct measurement of causes of death in low- and middle-income countries. BMC Med. Feb 4 2014;12:19. doi: 10.1186/1741-7015-12-19 - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types