Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Jul;8(2):e002366.
doi: 10.1136/rmdopen-2022-002366.

Impact of clinical domains other than arthritis on composite outcomes in psoriatic arthritis: comparison of treatment effects in the SEAM-PsA trial

Affiliations

Impact of clinical domains other than arthritis on composite outcomes in psoriatic arthritis: comparison of treatment effects in the SEAM-PsA trial

Philip S Helliwell et al. RMD Open. 2022 Jul.

Abstract

Objective: We used the Study of Etanercept And Methotrexate in Combination or as Monotherapy in Subjects with Psoriatic Arthritis (SEAM-PsA) data set to examine the impact of presence of enthesitis, dactylitis, nail disease and/or psoriasis on treatment response in patients with early psoriatic arthritis (PsA).

Methods: This post hoc analysis evaluated the effect of baseline Spondyloarthritis Research Consortium of Canada (SPARCC) Enthesitis Index (EI), Leeds Enthesitis Index (LEI), Leeds Dactylitis Index (LDI), modified Nail Psoriasis Severity Index (mNAPSI) scores and body surface area (BSA) on composite outcomes of minimal disease activity (MDA) responses, Psoriatic Arthritis Disease Activity Score (PASDAS) low disease activity (LDA), PASDAS changes and Good Responses and Disease Activity Index for Psoriatic Arthritis (DAPSA) scores at Week 24.

Results: Overall, 851 patients completed the SEAM-PsA trial and were included in the analysis. Baseline enthesitis (SPARCC EI>0 vs SPARCC EI=0 or LEI>0 vs LEI=0) was not associated with improved outcomes. Baseline dactylitis (LDI>0 vs LDI=0) was positively associated with improved MDA (OR: 1.4, p=0.0457), PASDAS LDA (OR: 1.8, p=0.0014) and Good Responses (OR: 1.6, p=0.0101) and greater reductions in PASDAS (estimate: -0.9, p<0.0001) and DAPSA scores (estimate: -3.8, p=0.0155) at Week 24. Similarly, baseline nail disease (mNAPSI >1 vs mNAPSI≤1) was positively associated with improved MDA (OR: 1.8, p=0.0233) and PASDAS LDA (OR: 1.8, p=0.0168) responses and greater reduction in PASDAS (estimate: -0.7, p=0.0005) at Week 24.

Conclusions: Results from our analysis suggest that presence of dactylitis and nail disease, but not enthesitis, are associated with improved outcomes in patients with early PsA who were treated with methotrexate and/or etanercept.

Keywords: Antirheumatic Agents; Arthritis; Methotrexate; Tumor Necrosis Factor Inhibitors.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests: PSH has received grant/research support and/or speaker/honoraria from AbbVie, Novartis, Janssen and Pfizer. PJM has received research grants and has served as a consultant or has been a speaker for AbbVie, Amgen, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bristol Myers Squibb, Celgene, Galapagos, Gilead, GlaxoSmithKline, Janssen, Novartis, Pfizer, SUN Pharma and UCB. AK declares no conflicts for this work. LCC has received grants/research support from AbbVie, Amgen, Celgene, Eli Lilly, Janssen, Novartis and Pfizer; has worked as a paid consultant for AbbVie, Amgen, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bristol Myers Squibb, Celgene, Eli Lilly, Gilead, Galapagos, Janssen, Novartis, Pfizer and UCB; and has been paid as a speaker for AbbVie, Amgen, Biogen, Celgene, Eli Lilly, Galapagos, Gilead, Janssen, medac, Novartis, Pfizer and UCB. AO has received research grants from AbbVie, Novartis and Pfizer to University of Pennsylvania and Amgen to FORWARD/NDB; has received consulting fees from AbbVie, Amgen, Bristol Myers Squibb, Celgene, CorEvitas, Gilead, Janssen, Lilly, Novartis, Pfizer and UCB; and reports receipt of royalties from Novartis (to spouse). AD has received research grants from AbbVie, GlaxoSmithKline, Novartis, Pfizer and UCB and has received consulting fees from AbbVie, Amgen, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bristol Myers Squibb, Celgene, Gilead, GlaxoSmithKline, Janssen, Novartis, Pfizer and UCB. VS has received consulting fees from AbbVie, Amgen, Arena, Aria, AstraZeneca, Bayer, Bioventus, Bristol Myers Squibb, Boehringer Ingelheim, Celltrion, Corrona, Crescendo/Myriad, EMD Serono, Equillium, Flexion, Genentech/Roche, Glenmark, GSK, Horizon, Inmedix, Janssen, Kypha, Eli Lilly, Merck, Novartis, Pfizer, Regeneron, Samsung, Sandoz, Sanofi, Servier, Setpoint and UCB. GK is an employee of and owns stock in Amgen. DC is an employee of and owns stock in Amgen. LXHL is an employee of and owns stock in Amgen. DDG has received research grants from Amgen, AbbVie, Celgene, Eli Lilly, Janssen, Novartis, Pfizer and UCB and has received consulting fees from Amgen, AbbVie, Bristol Myers Squibb, Celgene, Eli Lilly, Gilead, Galapagos, Janssen, Novartis, Pfizer and UCB.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Effect of baseline clinical domains on outcomes of MDA, PASDAS LDA and PASDAS Good Responses at Week 24. N=851; number of subjects in the full analysis set. Data were analysed based on logistic model adjusted for prior non-biological DMARD use, baseline BMI status (≤30 kg/m2 or >30 kg/m2), and baseline 66-swollen joint count for each clinical domain status evaluated (baseline enthesitis, LDI, mNAPSI or psoriasis-affected BSA). P values were unadjusted for multiplicity and are considered nominal. P≤0.05 are shown. aPASDAS LDA status at Week 24 defined as ‘Yes’ if absolute PASDAS score ≤3.2, otherwise as ‘No’, or as ‘missing’ if PASDAS score is missing. bPASDAS Good Responses at Week 24 defined as ‘Yes’ if absolute PASDAS score ≤3.2 and PASDAS score change from baseline ≤–1.6, otherwise as ‘No’, or as ‘missing’ if PASDAS or PASDAS change from baseline is missing. BMI, body mass index; BSA, body surface area; DMARD, disease-modifying antirheumatic drug; LDI, Leeds Dactylitis Index; LEI, Leeds Enthesitis Index; MDA, minimal disease activity; mNAPSI, modified Nail Psoriasis Severity Index; PASDAS, Psoriatic Arthritis Disease Activity Score; PASDAS LDA, Psoriatic Arthritis Disease Activity Score low disease activity; SPARCC EI, Spondyloarthritis Research Consortium of Canada Enthesitis Index.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Effect of baseline clinical domains on outcomes of PASDAS change and DAPSA score change from baseline to Week 24. N=851; number of subjects in the full analysis set. Data were analysed based on analysis of covariance model adjusted for prior non-biological DMARD use, baseline BMI status (≤30 kg/m2 or >30 kg/m2), and baseline 66-swollen joint count, and for each clinical domain status evaluated (baseline enthesitis, LDI, mNAPSI or psoriasis-affected BSA). P values were unadjusted for multiplicity and are considered nominal. P≤0.05 are shown. BMI, body mass index; BSA, body surface area; DAPSA, Disease Activity Index for Psoriatic Arthritis; DMARD, disease-modifying antirheumatic drug; LDI, Leeds Dactylitis Index; LEI, Leeds Enthesitis Index; mNAPSI, modified Nail Psoriasis Severity Index; PASDAS, Psoriatic Arthritis Disease Activity Score; SPARCC EI, Spondyloarthritis Research Consortium of Canada Enthesitis Index.

Similar articles

References

    1. Biondi Oriente C, Scarpa R, Pucino A, et al. . Psoriasis and psoriatic arthritis. dermatological and rheumatological co-operative clinical report. Acta Derm Venereol Suppl 1989;146:69–71. - PubMed
    1. Eder L, Haddad A, Rosen CF, et al. . The incidence and risk factors for psoriatic arthritis in patients with psoriasis: a prospective cohort study. Arthritis Rheumatol 2016;68:915–23. 10.1002/art.39494 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Menter A. Psoriasis and psoriatic arthritis overview. Am J Manag Care 2016;22:s216–24. - PubMed
    1. Ogdie A, Weiss P. The epidemiology of psoriatic arthritis. Rheum Dis Clin North Am 2015;41:545–68. 10.1016/j.rdc.2015.07.001 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Coates LC, Kavanaugh A, Mease PJ, et al. . Group for research and assessment of psoriasis and psoriatic arthritis 2015 treatment recommendations for psoriatic arthritis. Arthritis Rheumatol 2016;68:1060–71. 10.1002/art.39573 - DOI - PubMed

Publication types