Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 Oct;51(5):847-853.
doi: 10.1111/cdoe.12775. Epub 2022 Jul 21.

Reliability analysis using the in-lux examination method for dental indices in adolescents for use in epidemiological studies

Affiliations

Reliability analysis using the in-lux examination method for dental indices in adolescents for use in epidemiological studies

Rafaela da Silveira Pinto et al. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol. 2023 Oct.

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate the in-lux examination method to assess the reliability of examiners for oral health surveys.

Methods: A calibration study involving 10 examiners and 27 patients was conducted, and high-quality photographs of dental epidemiological indices were projected. The latter refers to the in-lux examination method. Two groups, comprised of five examiners each, were trained to assess dental caries (DMFT index) and malocclusion (DAI). The first group carried out in vivo (clinical) and in-lux examinations in the same patients. The second group performed in-lux examinations only. The measurements were repeated to obtain intraexaminer weighted kappa coefficients.

Results: Interexaminer weighted kappa coefficients of the in vivo examination method for DMFT and DAI ranged from 0.597 to 0.851 and from 0.574 to 0.844, respectively. The values for in-lux examination were between 0.440 and 0.856 (DMFT) and between 0.524 and 0.783 (DAI). The intraexaminer kappa coefficients of the in vivo examination method ranged between 0.569 and 0.851 (DMFT) and between 0.644 and 0.834 (DAI). In the in-lux method, these values were between 0.426 and 0.831 (DMFT) and between 0.341 and 0.838 (DAI). Three examiners did not reach the minimum acceptable kappa value (k = 0.610) for DMFT, and one for DAI. Of these, one examiner managed to reach the minimum kappa coefficient for DMFT after additional training. The three others maintained the kappa coefficients at lower than acceptable limits.

Conclusions: Calibration, using both in vivo and in-lux examination methods, was able to discriminate the examiners regarding their reliability to reproduce dental indices. The in-lux examination method was considered reliable and can replace the in vivo examination method. The in-lux method might be more feasible to evaluate the reliability of examiners when clinical calibration is unrealistic due to logistic issues and when a large number of examiners are involved in the survey.

Keywords: epidemiological studies; oral health; survey method.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

REFERENCES

    1. WHO (World Health Organization). Calibration of examiners for Oral health epidemiology surveys. Technical Report. WHO; 1993.
    1. Peres MA, Traebert J, Marcenes W. Calibration of examiners for dental caries epidemiologic studies. Cad Saude Publica. 2001;17(1):153-159. Portuguese. doi:10.1590/s0102-311x2001000100016
    1. Silva AF, Velo MMAC, Pereira AC. Importance of reproducibility of methods for dentistry diagnosis. RFO UPF. 2016;21. no.1 Passo Fundo Jan/Abr. http://revodonto.bvsalud.org/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1413...
    1. Brasil. Ministério da Saúde. Secretaria de Atenção à Saúde. Secretaria de Vigilância em Saúde. SB Brasil 2010 Pesquisa Nacional de Saúde Bucal: Manual de Calibração de Examinadores. Ministério da Saúde; 2009.
    1. WHO (World Health Organization). Oral Health Surveys: Basic Methods. 5th ed. WHO; 2013.

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources