Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Case Reports
. 2022 Jul 12:2022:9200469.
doi: 10.1155/2022/9200469. eCollection 2022.

Class III Orthodontic Camouflage: Is the "Ideal" Treatment Always the Best Option? A Documented Case Report

Affiliations
Case Reports

Class III Orthodontic Camouflage: Is the "Ideal" Treatment Always the Best Option? A Documented Case Report

Lorenzo Rustico et al. Case Rep Dent. .

Abstract

Angle's Class III is one of the most complex malocclusions to treat. In nongrowing skeletal class III malocclusions, the choice between orthognathic surgery and camouflage treatment remains a challenge to the orthodontist. In class III borderline cases, clinicians are called to find the best compromise between functional and aesthetics outcomes, with the latter which often turns in avoiding worsening of profile characteristics, which makes the treatment of these patients quite challenging. This case report describes a borderline nongrowing patient with skeletal class III malocclusion, upper incisor proclination and spacing, lower crowding, and arch width discrepancy, which has already undergone previous orthodontic treatment. The orthodontic treatment involved the mandibular first premolar extraction, resulting in class I canine relation with good overjet and overbite as well as good arch coordination. The orthodontic camouflage improved the dental relationship with normalization of upper incisor inclination without a relevant retroclination of lower incisors; the skeletal facial pattern of the patient experienced a slight improvement. The tendency to skeletal class III has remained nearly unaffected. Treatment outcomes were stable after 1-year posttreatment follow-up.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Pretreatment extraoral photographs.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Pretreatment intraoral photographs.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Pretreatment orthopantomogram.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Pretreatment cephalometric analysis.
Figure 5
Figure 5
Posttreatment extraoral photographs.
Figure 6
Figure 6
Posttreatment intraoral photographs.
Figure 7
Figure 7
Posttreatment orthopantomogram.
Figure 8
Figure 8
Posttreatment cephalometric analysis.
Figure 9
Figure 9
Pretreatment and posttreatment tracing superimposition.
Figure 10
Figure 10
12-month follow-up, extraoral photographs.
Figure 11
Figure 11
12-month follow-up, intraoral photographs.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Mackay F., Jones J. A., Thompson R., Simpson W. Craniofacial form in class III cases. British Journal of Orthodontics . 1992;19(1):15–20. doi: 10.1179/bjo.19.1.15. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Battagel J. M. The aetiological factors in class III malocclusion. European Journal of Orthodontics . 1993;15(5):347–370. doi: 10.1093/ejo/15.5.347. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Guyer E. C., Ellis E. E., McNamara J. A., Jr., Behrents R. G. Components of class III malocclusion in juveniles and adolescents. The Angle Orthodontist . 1986;56(1):7–30. - PubMed
    1. Jacobson A., Evans W. G., Preston C. G., Sadowsky P. L. Mandibular prognathism. American Journal of Orthodontics . 1974;66(2):140–171. doi: 10.1016/0002-9416(74)90233-4. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Cordasco G., Matarese G., Rustico L., et al. Efficacy of orthopedic treatment with protraction facemask on skeletal class III malocclusion: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Orthodontics & Craniofacial Research . 2014;17(3):133–143. doi: 10.1111/ocr.12040. - DOI - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources