A pilot trial investigating the feasibility of a future randomised controlled trial of Individualised Placement and Support for people unemployed with chronic pain recruiting in primary care
- PMID: 35866327
- PMCID: PMC9309751
- DOI: 10.1017/S1463423622000342
A pilot trial investigating the feasibility of a future randomised controlled trial of Individualised Placement and Support for people unemployed with chronic pain recruiting in primary care
Abstract
Background: We investigated the feasibility of recruiting patients unemployed for more than 3 months with chronic pain using a range of methods in primary care in order to conduct a pilot trial of Individual Placement and Support (IPS) to improve quality of life outcomes for people with chronic pain.
Methods: This research was informed by people with chronic pain. We assessed the feasibility of identification and recruitment of unemployed patients; the training and support needs of employment support workers to integrate with pain services; acceptability of randomisation, retention through follow-up and appropriate outcome measures for a definitive trial. Participants randomised to IPS received integrated support from an employment support worker and a pain occupational therapist to prepare for, and take up, a work placement. Those randomised to Treatment as Usual (TAU) received a bespoke workbook, delivered at an appointment with a research nurse not trained in vocational rehabilitation.
Results: Using a range of approaches, recruitment through primary care was difficult and resource-intensive (1028 approached to recruit 37 eligible participants). Supplementing recruitment through pain services, another 13 people were recruited (total n = 50). Randomisation to both arms was acceptable: 22 were allocated to IPS and 28 to TAU. Recruited participants were generally not 'work ready', particularly if recruited through pain services.
Conclusion: A definitive randomised controlled trial is not currently feasible for recruiting through primary care in the UK. Although a trial recruiting through pain services might be possible, participants could be unrepresentative in levels of disability and associated health complexities. Retention of participants over 12 months proved challenging, and methods for reducing attrition are required. The intervention has been manualised.
Keywords: chronic pain; pilot; quality of life; recruitment; vocational rehabilitation.
Figures
Similar articles
-
Individualised placement and support programme for people unemployed because of chronic pain: a feasibility study and the InSTEP pilot RCT.Health Technol Assess. 2021 Jan;25(5):1-72. doi: 10.3310/hta25050. Health Technol Assess. 2021. PMID: 33501902 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Carer administration of as-needed subcutaneous medication for breakthrough symptoms in people dying at home: the CARiAD feasibility RCT.Health Technol Assess. 2020 May;24(25):1-150. doi: 10.3310/hta24250. Health Technol Assess. 2020. PMID: 32484432 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Exploring the views of stakeholders about the feasibility of carrying out a randomised controlled trial of Individual Placement and Support for people unemployed with chronic pain based in primary care (the InSTEP study).Pilot Feasibility Stud. 2020 Apr 4;6:44. doi: 10.1186/s40814-020-00588-z. eCollection 2020. Pilot Feasibility Stud. 2020. PMID: 32280484 Free PMC article.
-
Preventing blood-borne virus infection in people who inject drugs in the UK: systematic review, stakeholder interviews, psychosocial intervention development and feasibility randomised controlled trial.Health Technol Assess. 2017 Nov;21(72):1-312. doi: 10.3310/hta21720. Health Technol Assess. 2017. PMID: 29208190 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Systematic reviews of the effectiveness of day care for people with severe mental disorders: (1) acute day hospital versus admission; (2) vocational rehabilitation; (3) day hospital versus outpatient care.Health Technol Assess. 2001;5(21):1-75. doi: 10.3310/hta5210. Health Technol Assess. 2001. PMID: 11532238 Review.
References
-
- Black C (2008). Working for a healthier tomorrow. Dame Carol Black’s review of the health of Britain’s working age population. www.dwp.gov.uk/docs/hwwb-working-for-a-healthier-tomorow.pdf [Accessed 24 June 2021].
-
- Black O, Keegel T, Sim MR, Collie A and Smith P (2018) The effect of self-efficacy on return-to-work outcomes for workers with psychological or upper-body musculoskeletal injuries: a review of the literature. Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation 28, 16–27. - PubMed
-
- Black O, Sim MR, Collie A and Smith P (2016) A return-to-work self-efficacy scale for workers with psychological or musculoskeletal work-related injuries. Quality & Quantity 51, 413–424.
-
- Black O, Sim MR, Collie A and Smith P (2017) Early-claim modifiable factors associated with return-to-work self-efficacy among workers injured at work: are there differences between psychological and musculoskeletal injuries? Journal of Occupational and Environmental Medicine 59, e257–e262. - PubMed
-
- Black O, Sim MR, Collie A and Smith P (2019) Differences over time in the prognostic effect of return to work self-efficacy on a sustained return to work. Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation 29, 660–667. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Associated data
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical