Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Jul 22:23:e39.
doi: 10.1017/S1463423622000342.

A pilot trial investigating the feasibility of a future randomised controlled trial of Individualised Placement and Support for people unemployed with chronic pain recruiting in primary care

Affiliations

A pilot trial investigating the feasibility of a future randomised controlled trial of Individualised Placement and Support for people unemployed with chronic pain recruiting in primary care

Karen Walker-Bone et al. Prim Health Care Res Dev. .

Abstract

Background: We investigated the feasibility of recruiting patients unemployed for more than 3 months with chronic pain using a range of methods in primary care in order to conduct a pilot trial of Individual Placement and Support (IPS) to improve quality of life outcomes for people with chronic pain.

Methods: This research was informed by people with chronic pain. We assessed the feasibility of identification and recruitment of unemployed patients; the training and support needs of employment support workers to integrate with pain services; acceptability of randomisation, retention through follow-up and appropriate outcome measures for a definitive trial. Participants randomised to IPS received integrated support from an employment support worker and a pain occupational therapist to prepare for, and take up, a work placement. Those randomised to Treatment as Usual (TAU) received a bespoke workbook, delivered at an appointment with a research nurse not trained in vocational rehabilitation.

Results: Using a range of approaches, recruitment through primary care was difficult and resource-intensive (1028 approached to recruit 37 eligible participants). Supplementing recruitment through pain services, another 13 people were recruited (total n = 50). Randomisation to both arms was acceptable: 22 were allocated to IPS and 28 to TAU. Recruited participants were generally not 'work ready', particularly if recruited through pain services.

Conclusion: A definitive randomised controlled trial is not currently feasible for recruiting through primary care in the UK. Although a trial recruiting through pain services might be possible, participants could be unrepresentative in levels of disability and associated health complexities. Retention of participants over 12 months proved challenging, and methods for reducing attrition are required. The intervention has been manualised.

Keywords: chronic pain; pilot; quality of life; recruitment; vocational rehabilitation.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Schematic illustrating the manualised Individual Placement and Support for chronic pain patients

Similar articles

References

    1. Black C (2008). Working for a healthier tomorrow. Dame Carol Black’s review of the health of Britain’s working age population. www.dwp.gov.uk/docs/hwwb-working-for-a-healthier-tomorow.pdf [Accessed 24 June 2021].
    1. Black O, Keegel T, Sim MR, Collie A and Smith P (2018) The effect of self-efficacy on return-to-work outcomes for workers with psychological or upper-body musculoskeletal injuries: a review of the literature. Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation 28, 16–27. - PubMed
    1. Black O, Sim MR, Collie A and Smith P (2016) A return-to-work self-efficacy scale for workers with psychological or musculoskeletal work-related injuries. Quality & Quantity 51, 413–424.
    1. Black O, Sim MR, Collie A and Smith P (2017) Early-claim modifiable factors associated with return-to-work self-efficacy among workers injured at work: are there differences between psychological and musculoskeletal injuries? Journal of Occupational and Environmental Medicine 59, e257–e262. - PubMed
    1. Black O, Sim MR, Collie A and Smith P (2019) Differences over time in the prognostic effect of return to work self-efficacy on a sustained return to work. Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation 29, 660–667. - PubMed

Publication types

Associated data