Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2022 Jul 22:23:e40.
doi: 10.1017/S1463423622000287.

Priority setting and cross-country learning: the relevance of TO-REACH for primary care

Affiliations
Review

Priority setting and cross-country learning: the relevance of TO-REACH for primary care

Peter Groenewegen et al. Prim Health Care Res Dev. .

Abstract

Aim: To inform the primary care community about priorities for research in primary care as came up from the European project TO-REACH and to discuss transferability of service and policy innovations between countries.

Background: TO-REACH stands for Transfer of Organizational innovations for Resilient, Effective, equitable, Accessible, sustainable and Comprehensive Health services and systems. This EU-funded project has put health systems and services research higher on the European agenda and has led to the current development of a European 'Partnership Transforming Health and Care Systems'.

Methods: To identify research priorities, both qualitative and quantitative approaches were used. Policy documents and strategic roadmaps were searched, and priorities were mapped. Stakeholders were involved through national roundtable consultations and online consultations. Regarding transferability, we carried out a review of the literature, guided by a conceptual framework, and using a snowballing approach.

Findings: Primary care emerged as an important priority from the inventory, as are areas that are conducive to strengthening primary care, such as workforce policies. The large variation in service organisation and policy around primary care in Europe is a huge potential for cross-country learning. However, the simple transfer of primary care service and policy arrangements from one health system to another has a big chance to fail, unless known conditions for successful transfer are taken into account and gaps in our knowledge about transfer are resolved.

Keywords: international comparison; primary care; priority setting; transferability.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Inputs for priority setting
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
Key topics for learning across health systems with issues specifically important for primary care in italic
Figure 3.
Figure 3.
Conceptual framework of transfer of innovations between health systems

References

    1. Batenburg R (2015) Health workforce planning in Europe: creating learning country clusters. Health Policy 119, 1537–1544. - PubMed
    1. Bosmans MWG, Boerma WGW and Groenewegen PP (2021) Imbalances in rural primary care: a scoping literature review with an emphasis on the WHO European Region. Technical series on primary health care . Geneva: WHO.
    1. EXPH (2016) Disruptive innovation. Brussels: Expert Panel on Effective Ways of Investing in Health.
    1. EXPH (2020) The organisation of resilient health and social care following the COVID-19 pandemic. Brussels: Expert Panel on Effective Ways of Investing in Health.
    1. Greenhalgh T, Robert G, Macfarlane F, Bate P and Kyriakidou O (2004) Diffusion of innovations in service organizations: systematic review and recommendations. Milbank Quaterly 82, 581–629. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types