Factors associated with recurrent spontaneous coronary artery dissection: a systematic review and meta-analysis
- PMID: 35866498
- DOI: 10.1097/MCA.0000000000001168
Factors associated with recurrent spontaneous coronary artery dissection: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Abstract
Background: The risk of recurrent spontaneous coronary artery dissection (SCAD) is a major concern to SCAD patients and clinicians. Identifying the high-risk subsets of recurrent SCAD remains an ongoing challenge. The meta-analysis aimed to assess the potential predictors for SCAD recurrence.
Methods: A literature search was performed in PubMed to collect studies that assessed potential factors associated with recurrence of SCAD among angiographically confirmed SCAD patients, including pregnancy, ventricular arrhythmia at presentation, history of hypertension, migraine, fibromuscular dysplasia (FMD), extracoronary vascular abnormalities (EVA), recent emotional or physical stress, and use of thienopyridine, beta-blocker, or statin. A meta-analytic approach was employed to estimate the relative risk (RR) with a 95% confidence interval (CI) by fitting random-effects models using the generic inverse variance weighted method.
Results: A total of 14 studies representing 4206 SCAD patients were included. Hypertension (RR, 1.49; 95% CI, 1.05-2.12; P = 0.0247) and FMD (RR, 2.02; 95% CI, 1.03-3.94; P = 0.0404) were associated with a greater risk of SCAD recurrence. The use of beta-blocker (RR, 0.51; 95% CI, 0.33-0.77; P = 0.0013) was associated with a lower risk of SCAD recurrence. Pregnancy, ventricular arrhythmia at presentation, migraine, EVA, recent emotional or physical stress, and use of thienopyridine or statin were not significantly associated with recurrent SCAD ( P > 0.05).
Conclusion: SCAD patients with hypertension or FMD were at a higher risk of recurrence, whereas beta-blocker usage was related to a reduced risk. These findings may provide insights into risk prediction and management after the SCAD episode.
Copyright © 2022 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.
References
-
- Kim ESH. Spontaneous coronary-artery dissection. N Engl J Med. 2020; 383:2358–2370.
-
- Sharma S, Kaadan MI, Duran JM, Ponzini F, Mishra S, Tsiaras SV, et al. Risk factors, imaging findings, and sex differences in spontaneous coronary artery dissection. Am J Cardiol. 2019; 123:1783–1787.
-
- Kok SN, Tweet MS. Recurrent spontaneous coronary artery dissection. Expert Rev Cardiovasc Ther. 2021; 19:201–210.
-
- Tweet MS, Hayes SN, Pitta SR, Simari RD, Lerman A, Lennon RJ, et al. Clinical features, management, and prognosis of spontaneous coronary artery dissection. Circulation. 2012; 126:579–588.
-
- Hayes SN, Kim ESH, Saw J, Adlam D, Arslanian-Engoren C, Economy KE, et al.; American Heart Association Council on Peripheral Vascular Disease; Council on Clinical Cardiology; Council on Cardiovascular and Stroke Nursing; Council on Genomic and Precision Medicine; and Stroke Council. Spontaneous coronary artery dissection: current state of the science: a scientific statement from the American Heart Association. Circulation. 2018: 137:e523–e557.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
Supplementary concepts
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical