Paradoxical Positioning: Does "Head Up" Always Improve Mechanics and Lung Protection?
- PMID: 35866650
- PMCID: PMC9555829
- DOI: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000005631
Paradoxical Positioning: Does "Head Up" Always Improve Mechanics and Lung Protection?
Abstract
Objectives: Head-elevated body positioning, a default clinical practice, predictably increases end-expiratory transpulmonary pressure and aerated lung volume. In acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS), however, the net effect of such vertical inclination on tidal mechanics depends upon whether lung recruitment or overdistension predominates. We hypothesized that in moderate to severe ARDS, bed inclination toward vertical unloads the chest wall but adversely affects overall respiratory system compliance (C rs ).
Design: Prospective physiologic study.
Setting: Two medical ICUs in the United States.
Patients: Seventeen patients with ARDS, predominantly moderate to severe.
Intervention: Patients were ventilated passively by volume control. We measured airway pressures at baseline (noninclined) and following bed inclination toward vertical by an additional 15°. At baseline and following inclination, we manually loaded the chest wall to determine if C rs increased or paradoxically declined, suggestive of end-tidal overdistension.
Measurements and main results: Inclination resulted in a higher plateau pressure (supineΔ: 2.8 ± 3.3 cm H 2 O [ p = 0.01]; proneΔ: 3.3 ± 2.5 cm H 2 O [ p = 0.004]), higher driving pressure (supineΔ: 2.9 ± 3.3 cm H 2 O [ p = 0.01]; proneΔ: 3.3 ± 2.8 cm H 2 O [ p = 0.007]), and lower C rs (supine Δ: 3.4 ± 3.7 mL/cm H 2 O [ p = 0.01]; proneΔ: 3.1 ± 3.2 mL/cm H 2 O [ p = 0.02]). Following inclination, manual loading of the chest wall restored C rs and driving pressure to baseline (preinclination) values.
Conclusions: In advanced ARDS, bed inclination toward vertical adversely affects C rs and therefore affects the numerical values for plateau and driving tidal pressures commonly targeted in lung protective strategies. These changes are fully reversed with manual loading of the chest wall, suggestive of end-tidal overdistension in the upright position. Body inclination should be considered a modifiable determinant of transpulmonary pressure and lung protection, directionally similar to tidal volume and positive end-expiratory pressure.
Copyright © 2022 The Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. on behalf of the Society of Critical Care Medicine and Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors have disclosed that they do not have any potential conflicts of interest.
Figures
Comment in
-
Body Position: A Question That Weighs Heavily on Lung Protection in Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome.Crit Care Med. 2022 Nov 1;50(11):1675-1677. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000005652. Epub 2022 Oct 13. Crit Care Med. 2022. PMID: 36227039 No abstract available.
References
-
- Drakulovic MB, Torres A, Bauer TT, et al. : Supine body position as a risk factor for nosocomial pneumonia in mechanically ventilated patients: A randomised trial. Lancet. 1999; 354:1851–1858 - PubMed
-
- Marini JJ, Tyler ML, Hudson LD, et al. : Influence of head-dependent positions on lung volume and oxygen saturation in chronic air-flow obstruction. Am Rev Respir Dis. 1984; 129:101–105 - PubMed
-
- Lumb AB, Nunn JF: Respiratory function and ribcage contribution to ventilation in body positions commonly used during anesthesia. Anesth Analg. 1991; 73:422–426 - PubMed
-
- Lumb AB, Thomas C: Elastic forces and lung volumes. In: Nunn’s Applied Respiratory Physiology. Eighth Edition. Lumb AB, Thomas C. (Eds). Edinburgh, United Kingdom, Elsevier, 2021, pp 14–26
-
- Hoste EA, Roosens CD, Bracke S, et al. : Acute effects of upright position on gas exchange in patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome. J Intensive Care Med. 2005; 20:43–49 - PubMed
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
