Clinical significance of low pre-transplant donor specific antibodies (DSA) in living donor kidney recipients with negative complement-dependent cytotoxicity crossmatches (CDCXM), and negative flow cytometry crossmatches (FLXM) - A single-center experience

Abstract

Background: It is controversial whether all donor-specific antibodies (DSA) detected by the solid-phase single antigen bead (SAB) assay negatively affect kidney transplantation outcomes. The study aimed to evaluate the possible clinical significance of low pre-transplant DSA in living donor kidney recipients. We analyzed a group of patients with HLA-A, B, and -DR DSA reactivities below a virtual crossmatch (VXM) value of 5000 MFI but with all VXM DSA reactivities at HLA-DQ, -DP, and -Cw, which were not typed routinely for donors prior to transplantation. We also investigated the incidence of persistent and de novo DSAs in available posttransplant SAB assays.

Methods: From the historical cohort of living donor recipients transplanted between 2014 and 2018 at our center (n = 82), 55 patients met the inclusion criteria, namely: these patients were > 18 years old with non-HLA identical sibling donors, who were not desensitized, who had available pre-transplant SAB results, and who had negative both complement-dependent cytotoxicity crossmatch (CDCXM) and flow cytometry crossmatch (FLXM) results. An additional donor HLA typing, performed for all 55 recipients, identified donor additional HLA-DQ, -DP, and -Cw DSA reactivities. These patients were then divided by SAB reactivity into three groups: 1) those with DSA-positive reactivities; 2) those with non-donor-specific anti-HLA reactivities (NDSA); and, 3) those who were anti-HLA-negative. All these recipients were followed for three years and checked for their de novo or persistent DSA.

Results: In the studied cohort, DSA-positive, NDSA reactive, and anti-HLA negative recipients constituted 33%, 36%, and 31% of 55 patients, respectively. Non-routinely considered pre-transplant HLA-DQ, -DP, and -Cw DSA-positive reactivities were shown in as many as 78% of DSA-positive cases (group 1) with the lowest MFI value of 319 to DP4 and the highest MFI of 5767 to DQ2. Of the pre-transplant HLA-A, B, and -DR DSA reactivities, only -DR52 DSA reactivity reached the highest MFI value of 2191. These detected DSAs did not reduce the mean estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) values and did not increase the incidence of proteinuria in recipients. While the 3-year graft survival was lower in the DSA-positive group (94.4%) with one recipient who lost kidney transplant, the difference was not significantly different (p = 0.7) from the NDSA (100%) and negative (100%) groups. In terms of the incidence of de novo acute antibody-mediated rejection (AMR) at three years after transplantation, no case has been reported in the cohort. This may suggest that low DSA-positive recipients do not experience higher rejection rate. However, DSA-positive recipients had a tendency for a higher frequency of C4d deposits in peritubular capillaries (PTC) and de novo DSA.

Conclusion: Our 3-year follow-up of patients with low pre-transplant DSA found no association with a deterioration in graft function and worse graft survival. Furthermore, we did not observe an increase in AMR in our patients with low DSA. A larger cohort and a longer follow-up period may be needed to evaluate the tendency of low DSA-positive recipients towards the higher incidence of C4d deposits in PTC and/or de novo DSA.

Keywords: Donor specific antibody; Kidney transplantation; Living donor; Single antigen bead assay; Virtual crossmatch.