U.S. Women's Knowledge of Reproductive Biology
- PMID: 35868957
- DOI: 10.1016/j.whi.2022.05.004
U.S. Women's Knowledge of Reproductive Biology
Abstract
Background: Having accurate knowledge of reproductive biology can help women to improve their general, sexual, and reproductive health and assert their sexual and reproductive rights.
Methods: This cross-sectional study examined knowledge of three topics (age-related fertility decline, egg supply, fertile period) among a national probability sample of 1,779 nonsterilized, English-speaking women (aged 18-29 years) in the U.S. general population. Using bivariate and multivariable regressions, we assessed associations between knowledge of these topics and individual characteristics.
Results: Most respondents were unmarried (63%), childless (78%), and intended to have children (65%); 51% did not know whether they would have difficulty conceiving, and 44% had discussed fertility-related topics with a health care provider. More respondents knew the age of marked fertility decline (62%) than the fertile period (59%) or that ovaries do not continuously produce new eggs (45%); 22% knew all three topics, and 13% knew none. In multivariable analysis, knowledge was positively associated (p < .001) with education, income, and having regular periods. Black and Asian respondents and those for whom religion was very important were less likely (all p values < .01) than White and nonreligious respondents to know all three topics. Knowledge was unrelated to relationship status, parity, childbearing intentions, receipt of fertility-related counseling or services, self-perceived infertility risk, or health status; the relationship with Hispanic ethnicity approached but did not reach significance (p = .08).
Conclusions: Young U.S. women have incomplete knowledge of aspects of their reproductive biology; these knowledge gaps could increase their risk of adverse health and reproductive outcomes. Policy-, provider-, and client-level interventions are warranted to address these knowledge gaps.
Copyright © 2022 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Similar articles
-
Determinants of child-bearing intentions of low-income women: attitudes versus life circumstances.J Biosoc Sci. 1992 Apr;24(2):157-66. doi: 10.1017/s0021932000019696. J Biosoc Sci. 1992. PMID: 1583030
-
Childless Canadian men's and women's childbearing intentions, attitudes towards and willingness to use assisted human reproduction.Hum Reprod. 2012 Aug;27(8):2405-12. doi: 10.1093/humrep/des190. Epub 2012 Jun 8. Hum Reprod. 2012. PMID: 22684907
-
Using reproductive life plan-based information in a primary health care center increased Iranian women's knowledge of fertility, but not their future fertility plan: A randomized, controlled trial.Midwifery. 2018 Dec;67:77-86. doi: 10.1016/j.midw.2018.09.011. Epub 2018 Sep 17. Midwifery. 2018. PMID: 30267937 Clinical Trial.
-
Understanding U.S. fertility: continuity and change in the National Survey of Family Growth, 1988-1995.Fam Plann Perspect. 1996 Jan-Feb;28(1):4-12. Fam Plann Perspect. 1996. PMID: 8822409 Review.
-
Individual fertility assessment and counselling in women of reproductive age.Dan Med J. 2016 Oct;63(10):B5292. Dan Med J. 2016. PMID: 27697140 Review.
Cited by
-
Clinicians' Perspectives and Proposed Solutions to Improve Contraceptive Counseling in the United States: Qualitative Semistructured Interview Study With Clinicians From the Society of Family Planning.JMIR Form Res. 2023 Aug 21;7:e47298. doi: 10.2196/47298. JMIR Form Res. 2023. PMID: 37603407 Free PMC article.
-
Abortion Rights: Perspectives of Academic Scientists in the United States.Womens Health Rep (New Rochelle). 2024 Sep 4;5(1):602-612. doi: 10.1089/whr.2024.0041. eCollection 2024. Womens Health Rep (New Rochelle). 2024. PMID: 39473985 Free PMC article.
-
Let's Talk About Sex: Tyrolean Online Study on Reproductive Health Issues.Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd. 2023 Sep 28;83(11):1371-1381. doi: 10.1055/a-2154-5134. eCollection 2023 Nov. Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd. 2023. PMID: 37928408 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources