1- vs. 2-year follow-up after posterior spinal fusion for AIS: what additional information is gained?
- PMID: 35869332
- DOI: 10.1007/s43390-022-00555-z
1- vs. 2-year follow-up after posterior spinal fusion for AIS: what additional information is gained?
Abstract
Purpose: Traditionally, 2-year follow-up data have been the established standard for reporting clinical outcomes following spinal deformity surgery. However, previous studies indicate that 2-year follow-up does not represent long-term outcomes. Currently, there is no clear data that demonstrate a difference in outcomes between the 1 and 2 years postoperative time-periods following posterior spinal fusions (PSF) for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS).
Methods: A multi-center, prospective database was queried for AIS patients treated with PSF. Clinical outcome scores, assessed by SRS-22, coronal and sagittal radiographic parameters were assessed at time periods: 6 months, 1 year, and 2 years post operatively. Complications and reoperation rates were also assessed. Statistical analysis compared outcomes variables across time-points to assess for significant differences.
Results: 694 patients (82.6% female, mean age at surgery 14.9 ± 2.13 years) were identified. Between post-operative year 1 and 2, significant difference in SRS-22 domain scores were present for function domain (4.5 vs. 4.6; p < 0.001), mental health domain (4.3 vs. 4.2; p < 0.001), and total domain score (4.4 vs. 4.4; p = 0.03) but were below the minimal clinically important difference threshold. New complication development was significantly higher within the first year following surgery than the 1-2 year follow-up period (p < 0.001) with greater complication severity within the 0-1 year follow-up period (P = 0.03).
Conclusion: There are no clinically important changes in SRS-22 domain scores between 1 and 2 years following PSF for AIS, with higher complications in the first year following PSF. Two-year follow-up data provide little added clinical information while under-estimating the cumulative complication and reoperation rates at long-term follow-up.
Keywords: Adolescent idiopathic scoliosis; Complications; Follow-up; Posterior spinal fusion; Quality of life.
© 2022. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Scoliosis Research Society.
Similar articles
-
A 10-Year Radiographic Study Comparing Anterior Versus Posterior Instrumented Spinal Fusion in Patients With Lenke Type 5 Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis.Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2020 May 1;45(9):612-620. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000003331. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2020. PMID: 31770332
-
Clinical and radiographic results after implant removal in idiopathic scoliosis.Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2007 Sep 15;32(20):2184-8. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e31814b88a5. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2007. PMID: 17873809
-
Minimally invasive scoliosis surgery assisted by O-arm navigation for Lenke Type 5C adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: a comparison with standard open approach spinal instrumentation.J Neurosurg Pediatr. 2017 Apr;19(4):472-478. doi: 10.3171/2016.11.PEDS16412. Epub 2017 Feb 10. J Neurosurg Pediatr. 2017. PMID: 28186473
-
Posterior minimally invasive scoliosis surgery versus the standard posterior approach for the management of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: an updated meta-analysis.J Orthop Surg Res. 2022 Jan 29;17(1):58. doi: 10.1186/s13018-022-02954-4. J Orthop Surg Res. 2022. PMID: 35093152 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Perioperative outcome and complications following single-staged Posterior Spinal Fusion (PSF) using pedicle screw instrumentation in Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis (AIS): a review of 1057 cases from a single centre.BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2021 May 4;22(1):413. doi: 10.1186/s12891-021-04225-5. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2021. PMID: 33947368 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
Ten-year follow-up of Lenke 5 curves treated with spinal fusion.Spine Deform. 2022 Sep;10(5):1107-1115. doi: 10.1007/s43390-022-00512-w. Epub 2022 May 9. Spine Deform. 2022. PMID: 35532842
-
Correlation of radiographic parameters and patient satisfaction in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis treated with posterior screw-dual-rod instrumentation.Eur Spine J. 2023 Sep;32(9):3140-3148. doi: 10.1007/s00586-023-07849-4. Epub 2023 Jul 20. Eur Spine J. 2023. PMID: 37470846
References
-
- Weinstein SL, Ponseti IV (1983) Curve progression in idiopathic scoliosis. J Bone Joint Surg Am 65(4):447–455 - DOI
-
- Asher M, Min Lai S, Burton D, Manna B (2003) Scoliosis research society-22 patient questionnaire: responsiveness to change associated with surgical treatment. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 28(1):70–73 - DOI
-
- Howard A, Donaldson S, Hedden D, Stephens D, Alman B, Wright J (2007) Improvement in quality of life following surgery for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 32(24):2715–2718 - DOI
-
- Pellegrino LN, Avanzi O (2014) Prospective evaluation of quality of life in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis before and after surgery. J Spinal Disord Tech 27(8):409–414 - DOI
-
- Smucny M, Lubicky JP, Sanders JO, Carreon LY, Diab M (2011) Patient self-assessment of appearance is improved more by all pedicle screw than by hybrid constructs in surgical treatment of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 36(3):248–254 - DOI
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Medical