Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2022 Nov;22(6):595-600.
doi: 10.1007/s40256-022-00544-7. Epub 2022 Jul 23.

Do Oral Factor Xa Inhibitors have a Role in Patients with Mechanical Heart Valves?

Affiliations
Review

Do Oral Factor Xa Inhibitors have a Role in Patients with Mechanical Heart Valves?

Shisi Li et al. Am J Cardiovasc Drugs. 2022 Nov.

Abstract

Mechanical heart valves (MHVs) replacement is recommended for younger patients with valvular heart disease because of the durability of the mechanical valve, but these patients need antithrombotic therapy for a lifelong time. The vitamin K antagonist (VKA) warfarin is the only approved oral antithrombotic drug for patients with MHVs. The direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs), including direct thrombin inhibitors and factor Xa (FXa) inhibitors, present some advantages over warfarin, such as weak interaction with drugs, no need for routine monitoring of coagulation function, and no frequent adjustment of medication dose. DOACs have been approved in the antithrombotic treatment of venous thromboembolism and nonvalvular atrial fibrillation. However, the application of thrombin inhibitors in patients with MHV is contraindicated because of the RE-ALIGN trial results, and FXa inhibitors are not recommended. Considering the mechanism underlying coagulation, it may be more efficient to inhibit the upstream coagulation FXa than thrombin. Recently, several preclinical and clinical investigations have looked into the role of FXa inhibitors in patients with MHVs, and have provided some encouraging evidence. Herein, we review the completed and ongoing clinical trials, and express our opinion that the following patients with a low risk of thromboembolic events should be considered for treatment with FXa inhibitors: patients with MHVs replacement 3 months postoperatively, patients with isolated aortic valve replacement, patients with a new, low thrombogenicity mechanical valve, and Asian patients. We hope this summary will provide meaningful insights for further clinical investigations.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Otto CM, Nishimura RA, Bonow RO, Carabello BA, Erwin JP 3rd, Gentile F, et al. 2020 ACC/AHA guideline for the management of patients with valvular heart disease: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Joint Committee on Clinical Practice Guidelines. Circulation. 2021;143(5):e72–227. - PubMed
    1. Levy JH, Douketis J, Weitz JI. Reversal agents for non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants. Nat Rev Cardiol. 2018;15(5):273–81. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Chan N, Sobieraj-Teague M, Eikelboom JW. Direct oral anticoagulants: evidence and unresolved issues. Lancet. 2020;396(10264):1767–76. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Pastori D, Lip GYH, Poli D, Antonucci E, Rubino L, Menichelli D, et al. Determinants of low-quality warfarin anticoagulation in patients with mechanical prosthetic heart valves. The nationwide PLECTRUM study. Br J Haematol. 2020;190(4):588–93. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Korteland NM, Etnel JRG, Arabkhani B, Mokhles MM, Mohamad A, Roos-Hesselink JW, et al. Mechanical aortic valve replacement in non-elderly adults: meta-analysis and microsimulation. Eur Heart J. 2017;38(45):3370–7. - DOI - PubMed

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources