NeuroSAFE PROOF: study protocol for a single-blinded, IDEAL stage 3, multi-centre, randomised controlled trial of NeuroSAFE robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy versus standard robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy in men with localized prostate cancer
- PMID: 35869497
- PMCID: PMC9306247
- DOI: 10.1186/s13063-022-06421-7
NeuroSAFE PROOF: study protocol for a single-blinded, IDEAL stage 3, multi-centre, randomised controlled trial of NeuroSAFE robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy versus standard robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy in men with localized prostate cancer
Abstract
Background: Robotic radical prostatectomy (RARP) is a first-line curative treatment option for localized prostate cancer. Postoperative erectile dysfunction and urinary incontinence are common associated adverse side effects that can negatively impact patients' quality of life. Preserving the lateral neurovascular bundles (NS) during RARP improves functional outcomes. However, selecting men for NS may be difficult when there is concern about incurring in positive surgical margin (PSM) which in turn risks adverse oncological outcomes. The NeuroSAFE technique (intra-operative frozen section examination of the neurovascular structure adjacent prostate margin) can provide real-time pathological consult to promote optimal NS whilst avoiding PSM.
Methods: NeuroSAFE PROOF is a single-blinded, multi-centre, randomised controlled trial (RCT) in which men are randomly allocated 1:1 to either NeuroSAFE RARP or standard RARP. Men electing for RARP as primary treatment, who are continent and have good baseline erectile function (EF), defined by International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF-5) score > 21, are eligible. NS in the intervention arm is guided by the NeuroSAFE technique. NS in the standard arm is based on standard of care, i.e. a pre-operative image-based planning meeting, patient-specific clinical information, and digital rectal examination. The primary outcome is assessment of EF at 12 months. The primary endpoint is the proportion of men who achieve IIEF-5 score ≥ 21. A sample size of 404 was calculated to give a power of 90% to detect a difference of 14% between groups based on a feasibility study. Oncological outcomes are continuously monitored by an independent Data Monitoring Committee. Key secondary outcomes include urinary continence at 3 months assessed by the international consultation on incontinence questionnaire, rate of biochemical recurrence, EF recovery at 24 months, and difference in quality of life.
Discussion: NeuroSAFE PROOF is the first RCT of intra-operative frozen section during radical prostatectomy in the world. It is properly powered to evaluate a difference in the recovery of EF for men undergoing RARP assessed by patient-reported outcome measures. It will provide evidence to guide the use of the NeuroSAFE technique around the world.
Trial registration: NCT03317990 (23 October 2017). Regional Ethics Committee; reference 17/LO/1978.
Keywords: Frozen section; Nerve sparing; NeuroSAFE; Potency; Prostate cancer; Protocol; Randomised controlled trial; Robotic prostatectomy.
© 2022. The Author(s).
Conflict of interest statement
Within NeuroSAFE PROOF, laparoscopic ports are supplied by Applied Medical but they have had no role in the design, analysis, or collection of the data; in writing the manuscript; or in the decision to submit the manuscript for publication. The NeuroSAFE PROOF TMG reports no other interests to declare.
Figures



Similar articles
-
Effect of NeuroSAFE-guided RARP versus standard RARP on erectile function and urinary continence in patients with localised prostate cancer (NeuroSAFE PROOF): a multicentre, patient-blinded, randomised, controlled phase 3 trial.Lancet Oncol. 2025 Apr;26(4):447-458. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(25)00091-9. Epub 2025 Mar 24. Lancet Oncol. 2025. PMID: 40147459 Clinical Trial.
-
NeuroSAFE robot-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy versus standard robot-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy for men with localised prostate cancer (NeuroSAFE PROOF): protocol for a randomised controlled feasibility study.BMJ Open. 2019 Jun 11;9(6):e028132. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-028132. BMJ Open. 2019. PMID: 31189680 Free PMC article.
-
Urinary Incontinence and Sexual Function After the Introduction of NeuroSAFE in Radical Prostatectomy for Prostate Cancer.Eur Urol Focus. 2023 Sep;9(5):824-831. doi: 10.1016/j.euf.2023.03.021. Epub 2023 Apr 7. Eur Urol Focus. 2023. PMID: 37032279
-
Neurovascular structure-adjacent frozen-section examination vs. standard robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis of two-arm comparative studies on functional and oncological outcomes.J Robot Surg. 2025 Jun 24;19(1):321. doi: 10.1007/s11701-025-02486-z. J Robot Surg. 2025. PMID: 40553352 Review.
-
Retzius-sparing versus standard robotic-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy for the treatment of clinically localized prostate cancer.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Aug 18;8(8):CD013641. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013641.pub2. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020. PMID: 32813279 Free PMC article.
Cited by
-
Neurovascular structure-adjacent frozen-section examination (NeuroSAFE) during robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis of comparative studies.Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis. 2024 Sep 4. doi: 10.1038/s41391-024-00891-3. Online ahead of print. Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis. 2024. PMID: 39232095 Review.
-
Intraoperative technologies to assess margin status during radical prostatectomy - a narrative review.Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis. 2025 Mar;28(1):81-88. doi: 10.1038/s41391-024-00868-2. Epub 2024 Jul 18. Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis. 2025. PMID: 39025926 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Fluorescence confocal microscopy for margin assessment in prostatectomy: IP8-FLUORESCE study protocol.BJU Int. 2025 Mar;135(3):502-509. doi: 10.1111/bju.16588. Epub 2024 Nov 16. BJU Int. 2025. PMID: 39548928 Free PMC article.
-
Nerve-sparing radical prostatectomy using the neurovascular structure-adjacent frozen-section examination (NeuroSAFE): results after 20 years of experience.Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis. 2025 Jun;28(2):483-489. doi: 10.1038/s41391-024-00851-x. Epub 2024 Jun 11. Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis. 2025. PMID: 38862777
-
Accuracy of the LaserSAFE technique for detecting positive surgical margins during robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: blind assessment and inter-rater agreement analysis.Histopathology. 2025 Feb;86(3):433-440. doi: 10.1111/his.15336. Epub 2024 Oct 15. Histopathology. 2025. PMID: 39403832 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
References
-
- Officen for National Statistics cancer registration data. https://www.ons.gov.uk/peoplepopulationandcommunity/healthandsocialcare/.... Accessed 18 May 2022.
-
- Hoffman KE, Penson DF, Zhao Z, Huang LC, Conwill R, Laviana AA, et al. Patient-reported outcomes through 5 years for Active surveillance, surgery, brachytherapy, or external beam radiation with or without androgen deprivation therapy for localized prostate cancer. JAMA. 2020;323(2):149–163. doi: 10.1001/jama.2019.20675. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Associated data
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous