Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Sep;13(9):1671-1681.
doi: 10.1007/s13300-022-01297-x. Epub 2022 Jul 23.

Comparison Between Continuous Versus Flash Glucose Monitoring in Children, Adolescents, and Young Adults with Type 1 Diabetes: An 8-Week Prospective Randomized Trial

Affiliations

Comparison Between Continuous Versus Flash Glucose Monitoring in Children, Adolescents, and Young Adults with Type 1 Diabetes: An 8-Week Prospective Randomized Trial

Anissa Messaaoui et al. Diabetes Ther. 2022 Sep.

Abstract

Introduction: To assess the impact of real-time continuous glucose monitoring (RT-CGM) instead of first-generation flash glucose monitoring (FGM) on hypoglycaemia in children and adolescents with type 1 diabetes.

Methods: In this randomized controlled interventional study, young individuals with type 1 diabetes used RT-CGM or FGM for 8 weeks. We evaluated changes in time below range (TBR), severe hypoglycaemia (SH), HbA1c, glycaemic variability, and impaired awareness of hypoglycaemia with RT-CGM (intervention group) in comparison with FGM.

Results: We randomly assigned 37 participants to either the intervention group (n = 19) or the control group (n = 18). At 8 weeks, we did not find a decrease in TBR in either group, but there was a significant reduction in SH in the intervention group. For participants with TBR ≥ 5% at baseline, we observed significant reductions in 24-h TBR, wake TBR, sleep TBR, and glucose variability at 8 weeks in the intervention group.

Conclusions: The use of RT-CGM versus FGM decreased SH in young individuals with type 1 diabetes, and TBR and glucose variability in patients with a higher TBR at baseline. The patient's history should be taken into account when advising on the method of blood glucose monitoring, as RT-CGM could be more effective in younger patients at high risk for SH.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT04249102.

Keywords: Children; Continuous glucose monitoring; Flash glucose monitoring; Hypoglycaemia; Type 1 diabetes.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Study design
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Flow diagram of the study
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Change in time below range (70 mg/dl) depending on the time below range at baseline: intervention (RT-CGM) vs control (FGM)

References

    1. Bulsara M, D’Arcy J, Holman C, et al. The impact of a decade of changing treatment on rates of severe hypoglycaemia in a population-based cohort of children with type 1 diabetes. Diabetes Care. 2004;27:2293–2298. doi: 10.2337/diacare.27.10.2293. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Blasetti A, Di Giulio C, Tocco A, et al. Variables associated with severe hypoglycemia in children and adolescents with type 1 diabetes: a population-base study. Pediatr Diabetes. 2011;12:4–10. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-5448.2010.00655.x. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Cryer P. Hypoglycaemia: the limiting factor in the glycaemic management of type 1 and type 2 diabetes. Diabetologia. 2002;45:937–948. doi: 10.1007/s00125-002-0822-9. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Martyn-Nemeth P, Quinn L, Penckofer S, et al. Fear of hypoglycaemia: influence on glycemic variability and self-management behavior in young adults with type 1 diabetes. J Diabetes Complic. 2017;31:735–741. doi: 10.1016/j.jdiacomp.2016.12.015. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Cox D, Kovatchev B, Julian D, et al. Frequency of severe hypoglycemia in insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus can be predicted from self-monitoring blood glucose data. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 1994;79:1659–1662. - PubMed

Associated data

LinkOut - more resources