Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Sep:210:65-73.
doi: 10.1016/j.puhe.2022.06.011. Epub 2022 Jul 20.

Impact of tomosynthesis on the evolution of the cancer detection rate in the French National Breast Cancer Screening Program

Affiliations

Impact of tomosynthesis on the evolution of the cancer detection rate in the French National Breast Cancer Screening Program

C Balamou et al. Public Health. 2022 Sep.

Abstract

Objectives: This study aims to evaluate the cancer detection rate in French National Breast Cancer Screening Program, especially the cancer detection rate during second reading session (Reading 2) based on digital technologies used in radiology centres.

Study design: This was an analytical and descriptive study.

Methods: Cancer detection rate was estimated by the ratio between the number of cancers detected and the number of women screened. The positive predictive value (PPV) was estimated as cancer detection rate among abnormal Reading 2. The relationship between Reading 2's PPV and the predictive factors was evaluated using multilevel mixed-effects logistic regression.

Results: A total of 1,380,006 digital mammograms were retained in the analysis between 2010 and 2019. Cancer detection rate represented 7.8‰ at first reading session (Reading 1) and 0.5‰ at Reading 2. Cancer detection rate is significantly associated with the use of tomosynthesis (P < 0.001) at Reading 1, and differences appear within different tomosynthesis brands (P = 0.007). Reading 2's PPV differs significantly according on technologies used by first Reader (P < 0.004). Nevertheless, Reading 2 has 1.9 (1.5-2.4) more likely to predict a cancer with the presence of previous mammogram compared with those without previous images.

Conclusion: Using tomosynthesis technology improves cancer detection rate at Reading 1, even if differences are noticeable between brands. Using tomosynthesis technology at Reading 1 reduces Reading 2's PPV and cancer detection rate at Reading 2.

Keywords: Breast cancer screening; Digital breast tomosynthesis; Mammogram double reading; Population screening.

PubMed Disclaimer

LinkOut - more resources