Comparison of Mortality Prediction by the GRACE Score, Multiple Biomarkers, and Their Combination in All-comer Patients with Acute Myocardial Infarction Undergoing Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention
- PMID: 35871592
- PMCID: PMC10017237
- DOI: 10.2169/internalmedicine.9486-22
Comparison of Mortality Prediction by the GRACE Score, Multiple Biomarkers, and Their Combination in All-comer Patients with Acute Myocardial Infarction Undergoing Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention
Abstract
Objective This study examined the ability of a combination of biomarkers, including N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide (N-BNP) and high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hs-CRP), to better predict mortality than the Global Registry of Acute Coronary Events (GRACE) score in acute myocardial infarction (AMI) patients who received primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PPCI). Methods The in-hospital mortality in 754 all-comer patients with AMI who underwent successful PPCI over 8 years was examined. A receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis was performed to determine the in-hospital mortality in a single center. A logistic regression analysis was used to compare the predictive accuracy of the GRACE score and biomarkers. The incremental predictive value of those biomarkers beyond the GRACE score was also examined. Results The mean age was 66±13 years old, and 609 patients with ST-elevated AMI (80.8%) were included. The in-hospital mortality was 6.8%. The GRACE score (in-hospital survivor/non-survivor: 106±33/161±32; p<0.05,) and N-BNP (in-hospital survivor/non-survivor: 2,458±7,058/8,880±1,1331 pg/mL; p<0.05) were significantly lower in survivors than in non-survivors. The area under the ROC curve (AUC) of in-hospital mortality of the GRACE score was significantly higher than that of the dual-biomarker combination (0.868/0.720; p<0.05). The AUC of the combination of the GRACE score and dual-biomarkers was not significantly higher than that of the GRACE score alone (0.870/0.868; p=0.747). Conclusion The measurement of representative cardiovascular biomarkers did not provide any additional benefit for mortality prediction beyond the GRACE score in AMI patients who received PPCI.
Keywords: acute myocardial infarction; cardiovascular biomarker; the GRACE score.
Conflict of interest statement
Figures
Statistically significant difference (p<0.05),
Statistically non-significant differenceReferences
-
- Kasanuki H, Honda T, Haze K, et al. . A large-scale prospective cohort study on the current status of therapeutic modalities for acute myocardial infarction in Japan: rationale and initial results of the HIJAMI registry. Am Heart J 150: 411-418, 2005. - PubMed
-
- Takii T, Yasuda S, Takahashi J, et al. . Trends in acute myocardial infarction incidence and mortality over 30 years in Japan: report from the MIYAGI-AMI registry study. Circ J 74: 93-100, 2010. - PubMed
-
- Granger CB, Goldberg RJ, Dabbous O, et al. . Predictors of hospital mortality in the global registry of acute coronary events. Arch Intern Med 163: 2345-2353, 2003. - PubMed
-
- de Araújo Gonçalves P, Ferreira J, Aguiar C, Seabra-Gomes R. TIMI, PURSUIT, and GRACE risk scores: sustained prognostic value and interaction with revascularization in NSTE-ACS. Eur Heart J 26: 865-872, 2005. - PubMed
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Research Materials
Miscellaneous
