Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 Feb 15;62(4):503-510.
doi: 10.2169/internalmedicine.9486-22. Epub 2022 Jul 22.

Comparison of Mortality Prediction by the GRACE Score, Multiple Biomarkers, and Their Combination in All-comer Patients with Acute Myocardial Infarction Undergoing Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention

Affiliations

Comparison of Mortality Prediction by the GRACE Score, Multiple Biomarkers, and Their Combination in All-comer Patients with Acute Myocardial Infarction Undergoing Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention

Yota Kawamura et al. Intern Med. .

Abstract

Objective This study examined the ability of a combination of biomarkers, including N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide (N-BNP) and high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hs-CRP), to better predict mortality than the Global Registry of Acute Coronary Events (GRACE) score in acute myocardial infarction (AMI) patients who received primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PPCI). Methods The in-hospital mortality in 754 all-comer patients with AMI who underwent successful PPCI over 8 years was examined. A receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis was performed to determine the in-hospital mortality in a single center. A logistic regression analysis was used to compare the predictive accuracy of the GRACE score and biomarkers. The incremental predictive value of those biomarkers beyond the GRACE score was also examined. Results The mean age was 66±13 years old, and 609 patients with ST-elevated AMI (80.8%) were included. The in-hospital mortality was 6.8%. The GRACE score (in-hospital survivor/non-survivor: 106±33/161±32; p<0.05,) and N-BNP (in-hospital survivor/non-survivor: 2,458±7,058/8,880±1,1331 pg/mL; p<0.05) were significantly lower in survivors than in non-survivors. The area under the ROC curve (AUC) of in-hospital mortality of the GRACE score was significantly higher than that of the dual-biomarker combination (0.868/0.720; p<0.05). The AUC of the combination of the GRACE score and dual-biomarkers was not significantly higher than that of the GRACE score alone (0.870/0.868; p=0.747). Conclusion The measurement of representative cardiovascular biomarkers did not provide any additional benefit for mortality prediction beyond the GRACE score in AMI patients who received PPCI.

Keywords: acute myocardial infarction; cardiovascular biomarker; the GRACE score.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors state that they have no Conflict of Interest (COI).

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
ROC curves for the prediction of in-hospital mortality in patients with AMI. (a) ROC curve comparing the GRACE score with each biomarker for the in-hospital mortality. (b) ROC curve comparing the GRACE score with the multi-biomarker combination of N-BNP, TnT, and hs-CRP. (c) ROC curve comparing the GRACE score with the combination of N-BNP plus the GRACE score. (d) ROC curve comparing the GRACE score with the combination of the dual-biomarker parameter (N-BNP, TnT, hs-CRP) plus the GRACE score. AMI: acute myocardial infarction, GRACE: Global Registry of Acute Coronary Events, hs-CRP: high-sensitivity C-reactive protein, N-BNP: N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide, ROC: receiver operating characteristic, TnT: troponin-T, Dual BM: combination of N-BNP, TnT, and hs-CRP, GRACE+N-BNP: combination of GRACE and N-BNP, GRACE+Dual BM: combination of GRACE and Dual BM
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
AUC comparing the prediction of in-hospital mortality in patients with AMI between the GRACE score and each biomarker, the dual-biomarker parameter, the combination of N-BNP plus GRACE score, and the combination of the multi-biomarker parameter plus the GRACE score. AMI: acute myocardial infarction, AUC: area under the receiver operating characteristic curve, GRACE: Global Registry of Acute Coronary Events, hs-CRP: high-sensitivity C-reactive protein, dual-biomarker: combination of N-BNP, and hs-CRP, N-BNP: N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide, formula image Statistically significant difference (p<0.05), formula image Statistically non-significant difference

References

    1. Kasanuki H, Honda T, Haze K, et al. . A large-scale prospective cohort study on the current status of therapeutic modalities for acute myocardial infarction in Japan: rationale and initial results of the HIJAMI registry. Am Heart J 150: 411-418, 2005. - PubMed
    1. Takii T, Yasuda S, Takahashi J, et al. . Trends in acute myocardial infarction incidence and mortality over 30 years in Japan: report from the MIYAGI-AMI registry study. Circ J 74: 93-100, 2010. - PubMed
    1. Granger CB, Goldberg RJ, Dabbous O, et al. . Predictors of hospital mortality in the global registry of acute coronary events. Arch Intern Med 163: 2345-2353, 2003. - PubMed
    1. de Araújo Gonçalves P, Ferreira J, Aguiar C, Seabra-Gomes R. TIMI, PURSUIT, and GRACE risk scores: sustained prognostic value and interaction with revascularization in NSTE-ACS. Eur Heart J 26: 865-872, 2005. - PubMed
    1. Wang J-J, Fan Y, Zhu Y, et al. . Biomarkers enhance the long-term predictive ability of the KAMIR risk score in Chinese patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction. Chin Med J (Engl) 132: 30-41, 2019. - PMC - PubMed