Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Dec;22(12):2912-2920.
doi: 10.1111/ajt.17159. Epub 2022 Aug 3.

Awarding additional MELD points to the shortest waitlist candidates improves sex disparity in access to liver transplant in the United States

Affiliations
Free article

Awarding additional MELD points to the shortest waitlist candidates improves sex disparity in access to liver transplant in the United States

Sarah Bernards et al. Am J Transplant. 2022 Dec.
Free article

Abstract

Since the introduction of the MELD-based allocation system, women are now 30% less likely than men to undergo liver transplant (LT) and have 20% higher waitlist mortality. These disparities are in large part due to height differences in men and women though no national policies have been implemented to reduce sex disparities. Patients were identified using the Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients (SRTR) from 2014 to 2019. Patients were categorized into five groups by first dividing into thirds by height then dividing the shortest third into three groups to capture more granular differences in the most disadvantaged patients (<166 cm). We then used LSAM to model waitlist outcomes in five versions of awarding additional MELD points to shorter candidates compared to current policy. We identified two proposed policy changes LSAM scenarios that resulted in improvement in LT and death percentage for the shortest candidates with the least negative impact on taller candidates. In conclusion, awarding an additional 1-2 MELD points to the shortest 8% of LT candidates would improve waitlist outcomes for women. This strategy should be considered in national policy allocation to address sex-based disparities in LT.

Keywords: United Network for Organ Sharing (UNOS); cirrhosis; classification systems: Model for Endstage Liver Disease (MELD); clinical research/practice; gender; health services and outcomes research; liver transplantation/hepatology; organ allocation.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

REFERENCES

    1. Freeman RB Jr, Wiesner RH, Harper A, et al. The new liver allocation system: moving toward evidence-based transplantation policy. Liver Transpl. 2002;8(9):851-858. doi:10.1053/jlts.2002.35927
    1. Elwir S, Lake J. Current status of liver allocation in the United States. Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2016;12(3):166-170.
    1. Washburn K, Pomfret E, Roberts J. Liver allocation and distribution: possible next steps. Liver Transpl. 2011;17(9):1005-1012. doi:10.1002/lt.22349
    1. Ishaque T, Massie AB, Bowring MG, et al. Liver transplantation and waitlist mortality for HCC and non-HCC candidates following the 2015 HCC exception policy change. Am J Transplant. 2019;19(2):564-572. doi:10.1111/ajt.15144
    1. Thompson D, Waisanen L, Wolfe R, Merion RM, McCullough K, Rodgers A. Simulating the allocation of organs for transplantation. Health Care Manag Sci. 2004;7(4):331-338. doi:10.1007/s10729-004-7541-3